If Specter is using "spygate" to tweak the NFL because of Comcast, why isn't anyone else accusing him of it beyond us fans? Even Goodell or Kraft could allude to that suspicion.
How 'bout his hometown newspaper?
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080209_Editorial__Sen__Specter_and_the_Patriot_Tapes.html
Surely, Specter's outrage has nothing to do with his backing of the cable industry, and his big donors at Comcast, who are in a fight with the football league concerning the NFL Network.
Or perhaps the NFL didn't get Specter's chief of staff good enough seats to the Super Bowl. Specter says he wasn't aware of the request and that the staffer would pay for the seats, which cost $700 each.
______-
Sports Illustrated:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/dave_zirin/02/27/spygate/index.html
....Yet, a closer look at Specter's incentives reveals what some say is a most unpleasant stench.
Long before Spygate, dating to 1983 according to aides, Specter has railed against the antitrust exemption held by the NFL....
......Here is where we start to get filthy. Specter was described to me by an opponent as "the Senator from the great state of Comcast." Is this fair?
Comcast is the No. 2 source of campaign funds for the Senator. Comcast execs and employees have given a reported $153,600 in contributions, going back to 1989. The No. 1 contributor since '89 is Blank Rome LLC, a lobbying firm that has dumped $358,483 into Specter's coffers. A chief client of Blank Rome is .... wait for it .... Comcast........
____________
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/articles/16579
“If you simply took Specter at face value, and assumed his passion for grilling the NFL in his official Senate capacity is the passion of a jilted fan, that alone would be an outrageous abuse of his authority,” writes the Daily News’ Will Bunch. “But the truth is much worse, because Specter’s interest in this issue dovetails far too closely with those of his two largest contributors, whose employees have given his campaign more than half a million dollars to keep him in office. I believe if there’s any Senate hearing involving the NFL and Arlen Specter, it ought to be the Senate Ethics Committee, looking at a potential link to these donors.”
There is far more, but I have to get back to work.