Welcome to PatsFans.com

This #1 seed thing is WAY overated

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PATRIOTSFANINPA, Jan 12, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    All this crap about fighting for the #1 seed spot has done NOTHING for any team since the 2003 Patriots -

    Its looking like its not a big deal about being the #1 anymore - Heck,even a team 16-0 could not get it done (you know what team THAT was ;))

    The #1 seed is a waste and bad luck since this decade started,Teams getting the #1 and sitting for a week have all but for a very few,come up flat as a pancake near the end.

    From now on I want our team to play well early..in december and into January and grab any spot they can - you can have that #1 seed

    The #1 seed lately has just been a spot where the team just has to sit and wait till they get eliminated or lose in the SB - Its like being on death row knowing you are going to die but don't know when.
  2. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    16,452
    Likes Received:
    290
    Ratings:
    +793 / 5 / -14

    #61 Jersey

    Well, being a 1 or 2 seed certainly has served the Pats well when they've landed it. I think playoff results down through the years still show greater success enjoyed by teams that get a bye, although it certainly is no guarantee.
  3. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Didnt serve them WELL ENOUGH last year

    You really have to wonder that if they didnt get that week off last year,were they ready to continue the roll without interruption,not counting the bye week of course and I believe there was also an extra week layoff before the SB as well although I cannot remember if last year was the designated year for a 2 week SB wait
  4. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,028
    Likes Received:
    442
    Ratings:
    +1,328 / 59 / -71

    Disable Jersey

    Can we please stop with this nonsense? The Patriots were the #1 seed last year and made it to the Super Bowl. The seed worked fine. The seeding system is NOT designed to have a particular team win the Super Bowl. If it was, there wouldn't be TWO #1 seeds.

    Good Lord, some of you people...........
  5. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady On the Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,971
    Likes Received:
    102
    Ratings:
    +169 / 1 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    I don't think being #1 overall is that important but I would definitely say that getting a bye is important. We had the bye in each of our SB appearances but one (86).
  6. letekro

    letekro Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +8 / 2 / -3

    What roll? They almost lost to the Eagles, Giants, and Ravens down the stretch and continued their mediocre play against Jax and SD. The Patriots didn't win because they weren't the best team at the end of the season. They almost lost a number of games but got lucky. Their luck ran out in the SB. This year, the Giants were the best team for most of the season, but losing Plax killed their offense. They lost because they just aren't that good, not because they had a week off.

    All things being equal, it is much better to have the bye week. Obviously, playing 2 games gives you a much better statistical chance of making the SB than if you have to play 3 games. Plus, home teams get that home cooking from the officials.
  7. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    18,405
    Likes Received:
    255
    Ratings:
    +657 / 6 / -9

    #75 Jersey

    It's called drawing conclusions from a small sample.
  8. SVN

    SVN Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    22,573
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ratings:
    +68 / 0 / -0

    #1 seed becomes overrated when teams are average.
  9. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    18,405
    Likes Received:
    255
    Ratings:
    +657 / 6 / -9

    #75 Jersey

    You're no fun. Well, since I found this article...
    Can't win if you don't get there.

    No. 1 playoff seed isn't all its cracked up to be - Don Banks - SI.com
  10. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Of all 8 Super Bowls in the new millennium,How many #1 seeds have won the Super Bowl this decade - including BOTH #1 SEEDS?

    Yep,thought so - 1 out of 8 - That answers my question,thank you

    Who gives a crap if you get to the big dance but find out you are not the best dancer? - After all the big deal in the end The Patriots got the same trophy the Lions got this year - nothing
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2009
  11. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,028
    Likes Received:
    442
    Ratings:
    +1,328 / 59 / -71

    Disable Jersey

    Wow...... Here are you competing with Maverick for most ridiculous thread and post of the year, and it's only January.
  12. ScottieC

    ScottieC Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,034
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    I'm not sure if being the No. 3 seed last year would have helped the O-Line out in the Super Bowl.
  13. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady On the Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,971
    Likes Received:
    102
    Ratings:
    +169 / 1 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    I didn't know they also gave the Lamar Hunt Trophey to the lions last year.
  14. Sicilian

    Sicilian On the Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    5,035
    Likes Received:
    167
    Ratings:
    +409 / 1 / -2

    So what's your point? That you should lose in your last game to make sure you're a 3 seed instead of a 1 or 2? But then look at teams that don't play hard in their final game because their seed is locked up. They come out flat in their first playoff game.

    You can argue that getting #1 doesn't guarantee you a super bowl win against (usually) 11 other qualified teams, but that's like saying having the best chance of winning a raffle doesn't guarantee your ticket is going to be called. It's obvious is what I'm saying.

    So again, what was your point?
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2009
  15. Clonamery

    Clonamery PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,321
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +76 / 0 / -1

    No, he's talking about a dance......maybe it was an ABC Dance show or something? Either way it's just plain silly.
  16. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,028
    Likes Received:
    442
    Ratings:
    +1,328 / 59 / -71

    Disable Jersey

    2001 Losers had the best record in the NFL.

    2002 Champions were tied for the best record in the Conference at 12-4. They won the Super Bowl. The AFC team was a #1 seed

    2003 Champions had the best record in football.

    2004 Losers were the #1 seed in the NFC.

    2005 Losers were the #1 seed in the NFC

    2006 Losers were the #1 seed in the NFC

    2007 Losers were the #1 team in the NFL

    In every season this decade prior to the current one, at least one of the two top seeds has made the Super Bowl.
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2009
  17. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Why because you can face facts???


    Heres a reality check genius .....

    OUT OF 8 TEAMS ONLY 1 HAS WON THE SUPER BOWL

    What part of this do you not understand ? - #1 seeds have NOT been successful the past decade as it shows as clear as can be - #1 seeds have been the favorites to win it all but only 1 (the 03 Pats have come through) - plain and very simple - just like your posts
  18. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Lamar Hunt Trophys are not what fans and players,coaches and owners thrive for - Nice to have in a showcase but not the top prize
  19. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey


    Shows you don't know what you are talking about - The 2004 Steelers were a game better in the regular season at 15-1 than the world champion Patriots at 14-2
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2009
  20. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,028
    Likes Received:
    442
    Ratings:
    +1,328 / 59 / -71

    Disable Jersey

    Try.... pretend if you have to, but try... to act as if you can grasp simple realities of NFL life.

    A.)

    The #1 seed is NOT designed to crown the NFL Champion. It is designed to reward the team from each conference that had the best record, tiebreakers included, in their respective conferences.

    B.)

    The biggest difference between the #1 seed and the #2 seed is that, if the seeds play out over the course of the playoffs, the conference championship will be played at the home of the #1 seed rather than the #2 seed.

    In other words, both the #1 and #2 seeds get to play one less game than the 4 other seeds, and both are guaranteed at least one home game. Nobody from either conference is given an edge in the Super Bowl.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>