Stoke city patriots
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yep.
If they can knock off the Jets in W1 (big if) that would be a great start. I expect a W in the home opener vs KC, and a W @ CLE. If they can split with NE and split out west with ARI/SF (back to back weeks and they've already said they'll stay out there to reduce travel fatigue) they should be in good shape. A loss to HOU and a W vs TEN @ home would put them at 5-4.
Not unreasonable. Not a given by any stretch, but not out of the question either.
Kansas City should be a much better team than either Buffalo or New York. Don't go penciling that one in.
Yep.
If they can knock off the Jets in W1 (big if) that would be a great start. I expect a W in the home opener vs KC, and a W @ CLE. If they can split with NE and split out west with ARI/SF (back to back weeks and they've already said they'll stay out there to reduce travel fatigue) they should be in good shape. A loss to HOU and a W vs TEN @ home would put them at 5-4.
Not unreasonable. Not a given by any stretch, but not out of the question either.
Everyone has their own opinion. I happen to disagree with you on this particular point.
I love the way the Bills match up with KC and expect them to win convincingly in their home opener.
Expecting to split with NE after getting the 1st win in 10 years, split out West, beat the Jets, KC, and Tenn all teams that were better than you last year really is the best possible scenario, not a reasonable one.
The Bills put up 55 pts on NE last year. Arizona is not a juggernaught and certainly can be had. The Bills blew KC out of the water last year. They lost to Tenn on a called back Spiller TD for a phantom holding call.
I don't think beating ARI, TENN, KC, and splitting with NE is best possible scenario. IMO that's a reasonable expectation. It may not break that way, but it's certainly there for the taking.
Please... break down your take for me. I'm interested, because I see the Chiefs as a very good team if the injured players from last year all return healthy. As of now, I've got the Chiefs winning the AFCW.
The Bills put up 55 pts on NE last year.
We will disagree that your idea of beating 4 teams that are better than you is reasonable.
Which ones?
The ones you listed.
Sure thing.
Keep in mind that it's April, but looking quickly JC shouldn't get much inside as KW and MD are superior to Lilja/Hudson/Asamoah. JC will pose some probs outside but expect those to be limited once the inside is closed off. Bowe/Breaston are solid but play right into what the Bills like to do on D and size should not be a issue anymore with two fast physical corners over 6'. moeki and Boss are solid but one of them will have to stay in a chip unless KC thinks Albert and Winston can handle Williams/Kelsay/Anderson 1 on 1. I don't think either of those tackles can do that.
On D, the Bills should be able to run down KCs throat with Spiller and Fred, which should help either Hairston or Glenn limit Hali's damage. Berry is nasty and should limit Campbell and Nelson over the middle, but KC does not have the horses to stop Spiller and Jackson, which should get SJ13 in some 1 on 1's with Routt (advantage Bills).
Poe is a nice addition, but with Wood healthy he should not a be a factor. The Bills should be able to run on KC at will if they can get a hat on Derrick Johnson. It's a matchup that favors Buffalo.
Ok, so your evaluation is based upon best case scenario for the Bills and worst case scenario for the Chiefs.
Nah, it's based on physical superiority.
I'm certainly no expert, but I think it's pretty obvious that the matchups I highlighted favor Buffalo.
Honestly, it does not matter right now anyway. It's April. Who know what will happen. I just feel the Bills are better than KC. You feel differently. I respect your opinion. It's cool.
Dude, you had Williams shutting down both the inside and outside against a lightning fast RB like Charles.
Sure, but K.C. went 7-9 despite losing their best Defensive player (Berry), best offensive player (Charles), and best TE (Moeaki) early on in the season, and starting QB (Cassel) during game 9. They had Tyler Palko start 4 games, for goodness' sakes. Buffalo, on the other hand, ended up 6-10 despite a clearly overachieving start to their season. They lost 8 of their last 9.
OL - KC
WR - KC
TE - KC
RB - KC
QB - depends on what year's Cassel we get
DB - KC
LB - KC
DL - Buff
I could have seen that a lot more easily than I can see a NT shutting down Jamaal Charles' runs both up the gut and outside the tackles.
I made no mention whatsoever of KW stopping JC on the edge. I simply said MD and KW are better than KC's interior OL, which should limit JC inside. if you want to say otherwise, that's cool, but i doubt anyone will agree. MD and KW are an elite pair of DTs.
So what you are saying is KC won one more game than BUF last year and had FAR fewer injuries?
Injuries dude? Really? To a Bills fan?
I kept them out of the convo b/c IMO that's life in the NFL but since you brought it up I DARE YOU to make a case that KC's injuries were more damaging than's BUF's in 2011.
I'm waiting.
Unless you think OLs match up vs OLs this logic is totally flawed. Even if KC does have a better OL than BUF, it doesnt matter b/c OLs face DLs and so on.
However, to play your flawed matchup game, you are gonna tell me KC's RBs are better than Buffalo's with a straight face?
First of all, the Bills don't have a NT. Second of all, I made no mention of their interior DTs setting the outside edge. Nor did I say "shut down", I said "limit". Huge difference, esp when referring to an elite player.
The Bills put up 55 pts on NE last year.