- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,592
- Reaction score
- 16,354
1) So, you don't think Hood, Jackson or Gilbert will have the highest value to Belichick at 23. I presume that Belichick will pick one if he sees the value, or would he pass as he might for a QB at that draft position? We'll see if one of them is there.
2) We can wait until the next off-season and consider trading up with 2 or 3 of our 2010 picks to hope to get a pick in 2010 who is ready to be major contributers in the 34 in their rookie year. Alternatively, we could find a top starter in the free agent market to replace Green or Seymour.
3) Would you expect any of your Day Two DE prospects to beat our LeKevin for a roster spot, or would you need to keep seven DL's on the roster?
2) We can wait until the next off-season and consider trading up with 2 or 3 of our 2010 picks to hope to get a pick in 2010 who is ready to be major contributers in the 34 in their rookie year. Alternatively, we could find a top starter in the free agent market to replace Green or Seymour.
3) Would you expect any of your Day Two DE prospects to beat our LeKevin for a roster spot, or would you need to keep seven DL's on the roster?
The only one of those four you could say was a positional "reach" was Graham. But the Patriots of 2001 are a far cry from the 2004-2009 editions.
Watson wasn't a positional reach. If Belechick put a lot of emphasis on position, tight end would have been off the board after already spending a #1+ on a starter. Or at the very least, a late-round pick. Watson is the best example of anti-reaching...taking whom you believe to be the best player available.
Mankins was considered by many to be a "reach" but not because he was an offensive lineman. He was a "reach" the same way some pundits thought Branch and Johnson were "reaches"...some "experts" expected them to be drafted considerably later.
Those two in particular, and you could throw various others in the mix (Matt Light, Ellis Hobbs, Eugene Wilson) were drafted because they were the best value on Belichick's board...which tends not to match up with Mel Kiper's.
If Belichick thinks that Gilbert or whomever is the best value available at #34, I have no doubt he'll be drafted. I absolutely do not believe that Belichick is going to commit #34 or any pick to draft a defensive end. There's no need to...We have four healthy, productive DEs on the roster now. On day two of the draft there will be better values (IMO) on the board, like Corvey Irvin, John Gill, or Nader Abdallah than to go off the value board to take one in particular. If Seymour and/or Green need to move on next year, then we'll use next offseason to address it.