Welcome to PatsFans.com

The Return of Burgess...

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by cloud34, Aug 13, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cloud34

    cloud34 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    ...and how it affects a roster spot. TBC and Cunningham are locks. Burgess is now a lock, the only way he'd be in trouble IMO is if he reported in horrendous shape, but apparently, he already passed the conditionoing test. That leaves Ninkovich, Murrell and Woods. All 3 play ST's. I'm thinking the return of Burgess puts one of them in jeopardy. Who goes?
  2. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,669
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +287 / 19 / -2

    I think that we need to see what we have in Cunningham first before we decide.

    My gut tells me that Ninkovich is likely the one in trouble.

    Woods is reasonable against the run, and is the top special teamer of the bunch. I ahve often posted the I thin Woods is a good enough special teamer to make the squad just as a special teamer.

    Murrell looked pretty good yesterday playing with the 1's and is also a top special teamer.
  3. Marqui

    Marqui Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,822
    Likes Received:
    57
    Ratings:
    +174 / 6 / -1

    Ninkovich is a JAG. Get rid of him.
  4. ahmed

    ahmed Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I guess I am the only one who liked Ninkovich last year? To me, he looked better than Woods.
  5. Urgent

    Urgent Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ratings:
    +122 / 1 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    I am very pleased Burgess has returned.

    Hopefully this was a personal issue, not a lack of drive.

    Best option to supplement a thin LB corps after the losses of Thomas and Crable. Better than breaking in another 4-3 DE who would struggle to pick up the scheme -- assuming he still wants to play.

    If Cunningham or Murrell can develop into two-down edge-setters, Burgess can rotate in for passing downs. At the least, a lot more depth than yesterday.
  6. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Agreed. 10char.
  7. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,669
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +287 / 19 / -2

    As some have said, he'd rather contemplate retirement than face Belichick's 2 a days.

    Well, it is the preseason now. Burgess has lost his reason for contemplating retirement.

    His could have more reps than any OLB other than Banta-Cain. He could be just an emergency backup. A lot depends on Cunningham. In any case, it is good to have the depth again.

  8. Urgent

    Urgent Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ratings:
    +122 / 1 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    On depth:

    Murrell started in preseason game one.
    Woods came in late. We've seen what he can do on defense.
    Murrell came up as a special teams LB.

    I'd put Woods at the low end of the roster.
    Murrell & Ninkovich can replace his ST capabilities.
    Both are better on the field.
  9. Reckedtrek

    Reckedtrek Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    That sums up my thoughts on this situation. If he's ready to get busy and play ball, I'm all for it. With the injuries the team has already had to deal with, there's no room for dead wood on the roster.
  10. ahmed

    ahmed Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Maybe he did not want to go through the grind of training camp?
  11. eagle eye

    eagle eye Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #85 Jersey

    Or maybe he thinks that missing it gives him a better chance to stay healthy for the entire season.
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2010
  12. ahmed

    ahmed Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Either way, it's not good for the team. Last thing we want is people skipping camp. I will forgive as long as he performs:D
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2010
  13. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,669
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +287 / 19 / -2

    I don't see how the team would be better off with Burgess having gone though practices twice a day for the last couple of weeks. The kids needed the reps. He didn't. Why would it have been better for him to risk injury? I guess it would have been "fairer". The bottom line is that Burgess is fresh, healthy and in shape.

  14. JSn

    JSn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,449
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -0

    I'd be surprised outta me socks if Belichick didn't see this coming a mile away.
  15. makoute

    makoute Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,107
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +18 / 0 / -0

    I liked him too, and I agree with you about him looking better than woods.
  16. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,028
    Likes Received:
    442
    Ratings:
    +1,328 / 59 / -71

    Disable Jersey

    Because he needed all the reps he could get in order to improve his ability to do things besides run forward?
  17. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,812
    Likes Received:
    126
    Ratings:
    +389 / 8 / -2

    #12 Jersey

    Not sure how Burgess missing camp is a good thing, but I just know that he's better than whoever else would have had his rotation spot, so camp or not, I'm glad he's here.
  18. QB12

    QB12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +12 / 1 / -5

    #12 Jersey

    Didn't like Ninkovich's body language at all yesterday. He wasn't playing with any confidence, surprising for someone who was all but handed the opportunity to earn a starting job. I agree he's in trouble.
  19. AndyJohnson

    AndyJohnson PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    22,807
    Likes Received:
    151
    Ratings:
    +584 / 20 / -14

    You've decided Murrell is better than _____________ because he got one sack?
    I think we need to see more of him to make that call.
  20. AndyJohnson

    AndyJohnson PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    22,807
    Likes Received:
    151
    Ratings:
    +584 / 20 / -14

    Agreed, if players dont need camp, why is there camp?
    Although at his age how mcuh will he improve. You know old dog new tricks.
    The best thing that can happen is that he is reduced to a rotation guy in sub packages playing about half as frequently as last year, which means the other guys are taking playing time away from him, hopefully Cunningham. If Derrick Brugess plays as much this year as last, something went wrong.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>