Welcome to PatsFans.com

The Patriots Might Be Better Off Without Wes Welker

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PatsFans.com Article, Feb 24, 2013.

  1. PatsFans.com Article

    PatsFans.com Article Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    The Patriots Might Be Better Off Without Wes Welker
    By: Russ Goldman

    Check out my thoughts on Wes Welker and the New England Patriots. ...

  2. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    Welker's value to this team is that he can get separation to catch a pass.
    Until other wide receivers can prove they can do this, the Patriots better
    hold on to Welker.
  3. kennyb

    kennyb Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,130
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +17 / 2 / -3

    blasphemy, but I concur. They need variety in the offense instead of just the 5 yard dump off to welker or those 10 WR screens a game.
  4. PATS68

    PATS68 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +17 / 5 / -1

    #87 Jersey

    Welker puts up great regular season numbers which are great, but 8 yard out cuts are not going to get the job done in the playoffs. What I saw out of others teams this year in the playoffs was explosion plays or chunk plays.

    Falcons, 49ers, and Ravens all have big fast wr's and the ball was pushed down the field with 20+ gains. Pats have no one besides Gronk who can get down field and present a big target.
  5. tonyto3690

    tonyto3690 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2012
    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    The way the title is wrong, but I can't disagree with what the article actually says.


    -Third highest scoring offense of all time
    -GOAT QB who can make Reche Caldwell look okay and Gaffney look great
    -Defense that got beat up by the big play all year
    -Defense that continued to not able to get a stop when really needed (Niners, Ravens, Ravens, Seahawks)
    -Defense that lacked any consistent pass rush without Chandler at 100%


    We are a better team with Welker.
    But I'd argue that we can be even better than that with getting a middle tier outside WR who is a lesser receiver than Welker and spending the rest of that money on a corner.

    I mean it's really not even a decision. It's either sign Welker or go into the season with Kyle Arrington as our #1 corner.
  6. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,401
    Likes Received:
    110
    Ratings:
    +180 / 4 / -5

    There's this thing called a draft. . . .
  7. AndyJohnson

    AndyJohnson PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    22,115
    Likes Received:
    75
    Ratings:
    +252 / 13 / -8

    We are not even close to that limited. And Arrington isn't under contract either.
  8. Ivan

    Ivan On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    5,848
    Likes Received:
    169
    Ratings:
    +444 / 12 / -31

    #75 Jersey

    Patsfans.com would be better without that "article." I am still waiting for it to demonstrate how losing a guy who is on a HOF track makes them better. Hopefully the follow up, PATS DEFENSE BETTER WITHOUT WILFORK, will be better.
  9. supafly

    supafly PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    13,964
    Likes Received:
    158
    Ratings:
    +377 / 3 / -7

    #24 Jersey

    Calm down, Ivan. It's just an article looking at the possibilities of using the resources that would normally be allocated to Welker on improving other parts of the team.

    As much as I agree with you, we'd better start preparing ourselves for the distinct possibility that Belichick feels differently, because that's the way this story is currently playing out.
  10. naF staP

    naF staP Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    "The Patriots Might Be Better Off Without Wes Welker"

    [​IMG]
  11. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Revis Island is here PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    17,039
    Likes Received:
    87
    Ratings:
    +209 / 3 / -1

    #95 Jersey

    in no way shape or form are the pats better without welker unless they get someone like a harvin or another big time WR...he walks and the pats offensive production will drop and with the major questions in the secondary and tough schedule next year...it may not be pretty
  12. Snake Eyes

    Snake Eyes Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,159
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ratings:
    +110 / 12 / -8

    ...which fell apart in the playoffs:rolleyes:
  13. JarOfMayo51

    JarOfMayo51 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +9 / 0 / -1

    The offense wouldn't be better off, but the team as a whole could be if they were able to then focus the cap room they would save on Welker into the defensive side of the ball.

    The Patriots have been a top offense for the last decade, so its not going to change because of 1 player. Production would go down from Welker's position, but the offense as a whole could still perform at a high level if they found a replacement for him and made up for his production with a few receivers, like Edelman and Hernandez.

    I wouldn't pay him more than $8 million a year, even though he deserves more than that. Paying Calvin Johnson money on a WR better get you a Calvin Johnson and that isn't what Welker is. Hes the best slot receiver in the game and fits well into this offense, but if you plugged someone else in there, they could get 80-90 receptions in his place. Yes, that is a dropoff in production, but the drop off doesn't go from 110+ catches to 0 catches...

    The defense needs a "shut down" corner badly. When Talib went out with that injury, Boldin had a field day against the D, making plays all over the field and outjumping and outfighting DBs for the ball. Guys like Talib can reduce the number of times that happens and really free up the defense from a scheme perspective.


    It kills me to say it and it will kill me to see it happen, but because of what Welker will demand in FA makes him a player that they can no longer afford to keep on the roster. Just remember what happened to the Colts with Marvin Harrison, he was around Welker's age when he wanted his final big payday, and he ended up costing them big time on their salary cap as he aged to 34 or 35 years old and retired... They were hurting bad from that contract, because his production fell off as he aged and didn't match what he was making per year.
  14. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Revis Island is here PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    17,039
    Likes Received:
    87
    Ratings:
    +209 / 3 / -1

    #95 Jersey

    Fell apart in 1 game of the playoffs...you make it sound like they were demolished the first game. Defense sure didn't help in the ravens game
  15. Snake Eyes

    Snake Eyes Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,159
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ratings:
    +110 / 12 / -8

    It's happened quite a bit in recent years. A Welker-centric offense = playoff fail:mad:
  16. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Revis Island is here PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    17,039
    Likes Received:
    87
    Ratings:
    +209 / 3 / -1

    #95 Jersey

    Right...all because of welker they have failed in the playoffs..no one else :rolleyes::bricks:
  17. supafly

    supafly PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    13,964
    Likes Received:
    158
    Ratings:
    +377 / 3 / -7

    #24 Jersey

    You may be correct. I don't necessarily agree with that thought, but there's enough of a possibility that it could be considered depending upon your point of view.

    I much rather would have seen the team build off of what we already had though, than start over and rearrange the nametags in hope of somehow being better that way.

    Let's say that you are right about the Welker-centric offensive failures vs better playoff competition. Wouldn't it be better to add the faster or more physical threat to the WR corps so that you could have both?

    I don't think it has anything to do with Belichick wanting more of a downfield threat, or he'd simply go out and keep trying to get one via cheaper methods. I think it just comes down to Bill Belichick's personal assessment of what he feels Welker's worth is moving forward, and he doesn't agree with giving him what he's looking for.
  18. Snake Eyes

    Snake Eyes Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,159
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ratings:
    +110 / 12 / -8

    I never said that, but when your regular season record setting offense puts up numbers in the teens then you have a problem.
  19. Snake Eyes

    Snake Eyes Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,159
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ratings:
    +110 / 12 / -8

    It would be better to have both but it comes at a cost, Welker wants to be paid and we dont exactly have a ton of cap space, so would those resources be most effective if spent on Welker or applied somewhere else?
  20. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,430
    Likes Received:
    282
    Ratings:
    +716 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    This argument has been dealt with in what seems like about a million threads now. This offense, the "Welker-centric" offense, as you put it, has lost only one game when the the key players were healthy. All the other losses happened when Brady/Welker/Gronk were out or injured. It's gotten to within about 3 minutes of winning two Super Bowls, despite the injuries, and it's done so with very little help from the defense.

    To say that the "Welker-centric" offense has failed in the playoffs is misleading at best.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>