I have no problem with that. I just think a handful of the newbies - along with some short-sighted vets, apparently - are making RIDICULOUS, way WAY premature pronouncements that never would've seen the light of day in years past.
The term newbie is ******ed. What is this rocket science? Do we need extensive training prior to posting? Maybe we could have minor/major league forums and the MODS could send people to & fro as they see fit. Anyway, are you talking about some of the newbies who suggested the PATS needed to overhaul their receiving corp or at least add a stud received for Brady after last season and who were among the completely ridiculed by some of the vetern posters, including yourself, for such a suggestion?
[/QUOTE]patsox23 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract Posts: 6,562
Re: We Do Not Need Any More Receivers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4
Receiver is not an area of need for this team. We almost reached the Superbowl with what we had, and came up short in that game mostly due to a tanked/injured defense, a missed Caldwell catch, and two bad penalties (Troy Brown PI and Ellis Hobbs PI). We can win with our receivers, and they are not as big a liability as people here seem to think.
Among our receivers...Reche Caldwell out-performed Branch this year. Jabar Gaffney came in and immediately produced for us. Chad Jackson, as his HS and college history have shown, always comes back strong in his second year after learning a new system. We still have Troy as well.
We have stacked our offense with talent over the past two years, and they just need an off-season to gel. Our primary needs this year in free agency and the draft, in order of importance, are:
- Inside Linebacker: a run-stuffer who can also cover tight ends
- Safety: a Rodney replacement
- Cornerback: only if Asante isn't coming back
- Get Josh McDaniels in the film room and have him scout his own tendencies and faults
GOD
BLESS
MAVERICK!!!!
Thank you for being a voice in the F-ing insane wilderness of this site. The Patriots may have looked iffy at WR early in the year. Fine. Chad Jackson did pretty much nothing as a rookie. Fine. BUT:
Caldwell had a very good year and is now fully acclimated to the system.
Gaffney really put it together once he learned the system, and had a very solid post-season.
Chad Jackson, while deeply disappointing, was a rookie who missed all of T.C. He showed flashes and while that doesn't prove a thing, the fact that most rookies make a big jump from freshman to sophomore, makes me feel okay about him. Especially considering, as Maverick points out, Chad's history in terms of blossoming in his 2nd and 3rd years. I'm very excitied to see how he looks in training camp.
The Patriots did not lose to the Colts because of their WRs. Were they perfect? No. But the offense did put up plenty of points. You people going off about WR being our #1 priority are way, WAY too spoiled by the Deion Branch effect. The vast majority of top-ranked college WRs do not come in and pick up a system - especially one as complex as the Patriots' - from Day One.
[/QUOTE]
Hell, some veteran posters were still arguing that what we were seeing with our own eyes wasn't actually happening, but soon Belichick's obvious agreement put an end to the argument.
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/showthread.php?t=50348