- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 15,684
- Reaction score
- 17,145
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.@PatriotsHaven: #Patriots doing 7-on-7 w/ perceived "first team". Chung lined up at safety next to McCourty... Arrington w/ a nice pass breakup on Amendola
Just to follow up on this, in late 2013, opposing quarterbacks were 21/39 199 yards and a TD when Hightower was in coverage. In fairness, a good portion of that had to do with the fact that he was playing in Mayo's position. But, as a LB, whether it's on the strong side or the weak side, he's going to be asked to cover. Again, that's a win for the offense. As a run-stuffing Sam LB, Hightower excels. That's what his skill set is. He's also capable of driving his man into the backfield on a bull rush and getting to the quarterback on a blitz. Again, his skill set allows him to excel there. His skill set does not include coverage, unfortunately. Whether it's zone or man, he's just not who you would want covering a TE and definitely not the guy you would want covering a RB. His coverage deficiencies are among the main reasons why offenses have been able to complete passes between the numbers against us with alarming regularity since the beginning of the 2012 season. I think the Pats should experiment with him more as a DE. He can play LB in a pinch in case of injuries, but I think he'd be more effective with his hand in the dirt.
Kontra, I agree with the fact coverage is not his greatest strength. I also agree I'd rather see Collins, Mayo or Anderson in their when we go nickel. We do have better options, and Hightower himself has already said he'd rather be rushing the QB than covering. I just don't think he's atrocious at it either that's all.
When Mayo went down last year, he struggled, especially vs the Jets and Broncos, but as the year went on he got better.
He's nowhere near the cover LB Collins or even Mayo is, but he's still much better at it than Spikes.
Well, he got benched against the Broncos because he was so bad in coverage. He got benched in favor of Dane Fletcher, who then went on to pretty thoroughly outplay him. Just out of curiosity, what games do you think Hightower got better in as the season went on?
I'm assuming this is just experimental and Patrick "Too Late" Chung is not on the first team when the dust settles.
Just to follow up on this, in late 2013, opposing quarterbacks were 21/39 199 yards and a TD when Hightower was in coverage. In fairness, a good portion of that had to do with the fact that he was playing in Mayo's position. But, as a LB, whether it's on the strong side or the weak side, he's going to be asked to cover. Again, that's a win for the offense.
Kontra, I agree with the fact coverage is not his greatest strength. I also agree I'd rather see Collins, Mayo or Anderson in their when we go nickel. We do have better options, and Hightower himself has already said he'd rather be rushing the QB than covering. I just don't think he's atrocious at it either that's all.
When Mayo went down last year, he struggled, especially vs the Jets and Broncos, but as the year went on he got better.
He's nowhere near the cover LB Collins or even Mayo is, but he's still much better at it than Spikes.
I know I am in the minority, but I still think Chung can be effective in a limited role. He might be mostly be a run down guy. He is a good special teamer (as long as he isn't the guy calling punt fakes). So the Pats can carry him even if he is only on the field 15-20 plays at most a game.
@Baltimore, Indy playoff game.
If I remember correctly, Collins and Hightower were the LB's getting the bulk of playing time during the playoffs.
I do agree, thst Broncos Sunday night game did change when Hightower got benched for Fletcher. But I wouldn't say Fletcher outplayed Hightower the rest of the year.
I am skeptical if Hightower is even going to be good at Rushing the passer...I think we much better options than him in that role.
Baltimore was totally inept, offensively, in that game. The defense looked like the '85 Bears. Fun game to watch, though. As for the Indy playoff game, outside of one play, I think you might be overrating him a bit. But to each his own...
I was talking about that game. Not the rest of the year. Fletcher looked like the much more competent LB and Hightower looked lost. Again, he is what he is. He's excellent in coming up and taking on the run and he's good when blitzing. His weaknesses are his ability to shed blocks (something that Wilfork coming back should help him with) when OL get to the second level and coverage. Why anybody would try to argue that he's competent in coverage is honestly beyond me.
Hightower needs to lose some weight before he can improve in coversge
@Baltimore, Indy playoff game.
If I remember correctly, Collins and Hightower were the LB's getting the bulk of playing time during the playoffs.
I know I am in the minority, but I still think Chung can be effective in a limited role. He might be mostly be a run down guy. He is a good special teamer (as long as he isn't the guy calling punt fakes). So the Pats can carry him even if he is only on the field 15-20 plays at most a game.
Mike Reiss@MikeReiss24m
Competition level rising at Pats camp: After one play in 7-on-7 drills, WR Julian Edelman & CB Kyle Arrington got into minor shoving match.