Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Harry Boy, Mar 10, 2007.
The Next President
Uh-h-h, I don't think so, my man.
Walter Williams with Condi Rice as a running mate. Would love to see the lefties insult 2 blacks with one being female.
Throw T Sowell in there instead of Condi, the debates would be hoot since both have an IQ double any of the pols out there.
Yeah, and I'd love to see John Edwards with Al Gore as a running mate. Would love to see the righties insult 2 whites with both being male.
Why the dems always run whites, black people don't get power in the dem party they are only allowed to vote to maintain the liberal welfare plantation.
more stereotype from our resident Archie Bunker.... liberal "welfare plantation"... could there be MORE ignorant "white power" undertones in one statement?
you're a genius...
BINGO!!! Go to the head of the class!
Are you saying that the 90%+ of blacks who support Democrats did so to support the liberal welfare plantation? I'd call that comment racist, but instead I'll just attribute it to ignorance.
I do that all the time, I insult the whole damn tribe of sore losing white backstabbers, Pelosi/Kennedy/Kerry/Gore/Reid/Clintons etc.
Bring back Tip O'Neil or Truman and I will return, even JFK.
I think that is the net efffect of their votes. The Welfare bureaucracy has a vested interest in continuing the cycle of poverty. No poverty.....no 'customers' for their programs.
Conservatives would rather see everyone out of poverty so the programs would die and there would be more taxpayers sharing the load.
I have seen black people in positions of real power in republican administrations, I have seen no similar positions for black people in dem administrations.
If you have an example by all means present it. What happened when a black man wanted to be the Speaker, he was told to get back in his place.
The last black from Massachusetts to serve in national office was Senator Ed Brook, Republican.
From Condi Rice to Colin Powell and others, the Repubs have given far more chances to blacks than have the Dems.
So you know better than the black people what's in their individual interest? That's quite a claim. Also, are "black" and "poor" synonyms for you?
And conservatives will get them out of poverty by ....?
That would be easy, an Ambulance chaser and a hypocrite.
I think that's what he's saying. I don't think such a comment is racist either. He's not denegrating blacks as much as he is merely putting forth his belief in why they vote dem so blindly.
Some dems do want people more dependent on government services. The more dependent they are, the more important politicians become, especially those who are the ones fighting to provide you with the free services.
Remember now, I said "some", and not all.
I don't claim anything. I just look at evaluate the results of policy.
Demographics are what they are. BTW it is the 'Black Leadership" that claim black people lag economically.
He libs believe in a fixed economic policy and people getting scraps from government. Conservatives (not necessarily republicans) believe in expanded growth and opportunity by reducing the burden on taxpayers allowing them to invest therir money in productive enterprises rather than expanding the amount spent on overhead (government).
A Ste4ve Forbes administration would be the best thing that could happen in this country to expand oportunity for the poor and disadvantaged (regardless of race, which shouldn't be a consideration).
Separate names with a comma.