PatsFaninAZ
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 4,091
- Reaction score
- 0
One thing about Kaepernick too -- while he's mobile, it's just another dimension. You don't see too many mobile QBs who also are good pocket passers. He's big, sees over the line, and has pretty good timing and accuracy for a guy with fewer than 20 NFL games under his belt.
The point is that unlike most of the "mobile QBs," he doesn't need to gain 100 yards a game to be great. He's going to learn to throw on the run, which is a matter of mechanics. If he can train himself to use his speed for escapability and save his running for the occasional draw or when the team needs it for a first down, he could avoid a lot of the pitfalls of other running QBs.
The bottom line is that he doesn't need to run to be great. He's actually been better this year when he had few or no planned runs. Against the Bears, he only had 10 yards and I think only one non-scramble runs. He had a 133 QB rating with 2 TDs and zero picks. Against us, he had very few planned runs and was well contained but threw 4 TDs against one pick. Against the Cardinals, he had pretty much no runs and still threw the ball well.
He also takes care of the ball. Only 3 picks this year -- he has an exceptional picks per attempts ratio; 1.37 interceptions per 100 passes thrown. To put that in perspective with the best in the league -- Aaron Rogers 1.53, Ben Roethlisberger 1.78, Peyton Manning 1.88, Joe Flacco 1.88. Everyone else except guys with very few attempts is well above 2.0. (E.g., Russell Wilson 2.5, Bradford 2.3, Schaub 2.2, Stafford 2.3, Romo 2.9, Palmer 2.5, Dalton 3.0, Luck 2.8.)
Only Brady is better at 1.255.
The point is that unlike most of the "mobile QBs," he doesn't need to gain 100 yards a game to be great. He's going to learn to throw on the run, which is a matter of mechanics. If he can train himself to use his speed for escapability and save his running for the occasional draw or when the team needs it for a first down, he could avoid a lot of the pitfalls of other running QBs.
The bottom line is that he doesn't need to run to be great. He's actually been better this year when he had few or no planned runs. Against the Bears, he only had 10 yards and I think only one non-scramble runs. He had a 133 QB rating with 2 TDs and zero picks. Against us, he had very few planned runs and was well contained but threw 4 TDs against one pick. Against the Cardinals, he had pretty much no runs and still threw the ball well.
He also takes care of the ball. Only 3 picks this year -- he has an exceptional picks per attempts ratio; 1.37 interceptions per 100 passes thrown. To put that in perspective with the best in the league -- Aaron Rogers 1.53, Ben Roethlisberger 1.78, Peyton Manning 1.88, Joe Flacco 1.88. Everyone else except guys with very few attempts is well above 2.0. (E.g., Russell Wilson 2.5, Bradford 2.3, Schaub 2.2, Stafford 2.3, Romo 2.9, Palmer 2.5, Dalton 3.0, Luck 2.8.)
Only Brady is better at 1.255.
Last edited: