Welcome to PatsFans.com

The Myth of the Weak Colts Defense

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by shakadave, Sep 7, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shakadave

    shakadave Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I'll let the thread title speak for itself.
  2. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    40,771
    Likes Received:
    58
    Ratings:
    +81 / 3 / -1

    Disable Jersey

    And I'll let the course of the entire season do that talking. I'm guessing that will speak much louder than this one game, but it won't be saying the same thing.
  3. fair catch fryar

    fair catch fryar Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    The Colts defense is very good as long as Bob Sanders is healthy. The minute he's out they become ineffective in multiple areas. Although the LB Keiaho looked good too.
  4. T-ShirtDynasty

    T-ShirtDynasty Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,562
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    If they can keep that up like they did last night, they'll be damn scary. Holy-Cow scary. Fast, swarming to the ball, hard hitting, aggressive.... Gads, Bob Sanders is a beast.

    Imagine how scary they would have been to Brees last night if the zebras called a few of those 4 or 5 obvious holds on Freeney.
  5. ClevTrev

    ClevTrev Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    No one has mentioned Freddy Keiaho who came up big last night with 6 tackles, all hard hits. He's got Colts fans saying, "Cato who?"
  6. letekro

    letekro Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    You can run on them. Bring Sanders up and then hit them deep. Problem is, you need a good defense to be able to make the commitment to the run.

    Keep in mind they are a different defense outside of that dome. The crowd noise helps those defensive ends immensely.
  7. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,112
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +33 / 0 / -0

    They certainly looked good against New Orleans. But just in case they fall apart in week 2, keep in mind that you can reuse this thread title with just a couple of minor tweaks:

    "The Myth of the Week: Colts Defense"
  8. rabthepat

    rabthepat Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,549
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    When they play with heart they are "GOOD" but still not "GREAT". I guess with Manning as QB "GOOD" is good enough.
  9. JaredOfNazareth

    JaredOfNazareth Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I saw that too. The Saints tried to stall the pass rush but couldn't. The Colts D were waiting for the short stuff because they knew NO couldn't protect Brees for long.

    I saw McAlister blow right through a Bob Sanders tackle for a first down. That was a down hill run for him though. For some reason NO kept trying to run off tackle. But that played into Indy's strength.
  10. JaredOfNazareth

    JaredOfNazareth Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Yeah the Saints were not going to pull it off.
  11. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    15,133
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    Could we merge all the freakin colts threads into one? As I recall, we play the Jets this Sunday.

    There are 11 freaking threads on page 1 of a PATRIOTS fan message board about the freakin Colts.
  12. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,360
    Likes Received:
    46
    Ratings:
    +59 / 1 / -0

    Let's not go overboard. They looked really good last night, but it was one game. As it was pointed out in other threads, the first game of the season can be deceiving and all you have to do is look at the 31-0 drumming of the Pats by the Bills in 2003.

    One thing that would concern me if I was a Colts' fan is that they did show in the first half that they can be exposed by teams that are good at the ball control offense. It isn't Brees' game and he was able to march down the field pretty easily. I think stupid calls on third down hurt the Saints more on offense than the Colts. It was Sean Payton's impatience in the second half and giving up on what was working that allowed the Colts' defense to really shine.

    If a team can put together long drives like the Saints mounted early, it will ground the Colts' offense too. From what I saw in the first half, I like Brady's and the Pats' offense's chances against the Colts' defense. The Colts' defense isn't a team you want to air it out on, but I think you can put together a lot of long substained drives against them.
  13. Peytonsbetter

    Peytonsbetter Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Thats par for the course with Freeney. The man gets tackled outright several times a game and held every other play. Its always been that way.
  14. Oswlek

    Oswlek Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    The Colts looked every bit as good defensively - possibly even better - against Pitt in the 2005 regular season. They were jacked and pumped about making a statement about the worthiness of their championship.

    I am still not sold on Indy's D just yet.
  15. STFarmy

    STFarmy Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    There's plenty of missed holds that could be called on that Colts O-line too. They say it's one of those penalties that could be called every down.
  16. Peytonsbetter

    Peytonsbetter Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Good call. It's one game folks. For a team one year removed from being historically bad on defense, especially run defense.

    Plus, the Saints were God-awful last night, really bad. And I'm not sure if it was because of the Colt's or not. Like I said, its one game. We'll know more in a few weeks.
  17. shakadave

    shakadave Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Let's at least put an end to the sentiment --- heard occasionally --- that the Colts are no longer a top rival for a championship. If Sanders makes as much difference as he is commonly credited with, let's insert him into any MVP conversations. Let's remember that if the Colts' vulnerability on D is power running, then we're not the team to exploit that. Let's realize that a safety duo of Sanders and Wilson is not a shoe-in to stop that receiving squad. And one more thing. Let's beat the living snot out of Indy.
  18. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,360
    Likes Received:
    46
    Ratings:
    +59 / 1 / -0

    Their defense is also vunerable to the short pass. That clearly isn't Brees' forte.
  19. Nordy

    Nordy Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2007
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I thought the Saints' 3rd down playcalling was absolutely atrocious last night. They tried to force the ball to Bush WAY too much.
  20. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,360
    Likes Received:
    46
    Ratings:
    +59 / 1 / -0

    Yeah, they killed that opening drive that the Colts had no answer for with a Bush draw on 3rd and 6.
  21. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,718
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    This game means nothing till we see more of that 'defense'

    Ask yourself this...

    Was the Indianapolis Colts defense really THAT good last night?,OR Was the New Orleans Saints Offense just out of synch and rusty?
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2007
  22. RayClay

    RayClay Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,518
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    The Colts hired a defensive coach for a reason. They have managed last year and in one game this year to mask the personnel deficiencies and emphasize the strengths. this is to their credit, they are a great team right now.

    The major problem with exploiting the Colts weakness on D is that you need to run he ball and pass short.

    Because of their ability to score points in bunches, exploiting this weakness might give you a lot of yards and T.O.P., but not enough points to win.

    When trying to pass, their quickness and star players Freeney and Sanders pressure and go for turnovers which lead to points.

    Give credit to their organization, even A-hole Polian (very smart, but still an a-hole) they're not Champs because they have the best players at every position, but because they execute game plans with the D complementing the O, much like the Pats have with a defensively oriented ball control approach in the past.
  23. RayClay

    RayClay Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,518
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    BTW, their defense can be exploited by a lot more than power running and running up the gut might not even be the best method.

    I think putting strong or quick players in the soft spot in position to break tackles for big gains might be more effective. You can't just eat up ground, you have to score to open up the run and longer pass. Think Maroney, Watson and Welker screens and pics (not that we'd do that). Even short passes to Moss. Quick stuff. Make them tackle one on one in space.
  24. Grizzafted

    Grizzafted Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    999
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Oh whatever. You bunch of chicken littles.

    We dropped 32 points on that defense, we can drop 41 on them this year. The issue with the Colts is, as always, can you stop their offense.

    You guys are really getting ahead of yourselves. Remember the second Monday night game of the season last year, when Jacksonville's D completely shut down Pittsburgh's offense? Everybody's talkin' super bowl? Well, turns out the Steelers just weren't that great up front, and we went to Jacksonville and dropped 28 on them.

    Relax. It's the Colts. You knew they were going to show up. They're good. But we're better. If you stop Addai and account for Dallas Clark, you will beat the Colts. The Pats did it in 2004, Chargers in 2005, the Cowboys last year.

    They're always beatable. They'll have another 12-4 season this year, but the Saints are not exactly an AFC powerhouse team.
  25. Buchanty

    Buchanty Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    since its the latest colts thread I will reply to this one. Given that we have been starved from "real" football since February and last nights game is all we have until Sunday then I can understand 11 threads on the PFF.

    The Colts did look good last night (not just good but dominating). However as many have pointed out it is the first game, they had extra adrenalin from the flag unfurling (dont we know that one!), and the crowd got behind them in the second half after falling relatively quiet during the second quarter.

    Anyone else get the feeling that Peyton was punishing David for that fumble recovery TD? Of course the first one came before the Saints only TD, but the other two looked like PM was dishing out a spanking. Of course the stats will show another 3 TD's but they were just too easy (at least half dozen other NFL QB's could have done the same). He didnt look so good in the first half when the Saints got some pressure on him. However the coaching staff did a great job of making adjustments at half time and the Colts came out blazing.

    Which brings me to my point, which is why the hell were there no adjustments from the Saints? I guess Sean Payton has let the '06 season go to his head with runner up to COTY award. He was downright awful. Deuce only got 10 carries for heaven's sake, and (as another poster pointed out) they spent the night trying to run off the tackle. Bush only got 12 carries but haven't they taught him not to dance before the LOS? With Horn gone the Saints had no deep threat whatsoever and (where have you seen this one before) the Colts crowded the LOS... killing any chance for Bush to gain much ground and forcing Brees to dink and dunk. Another poster suggested that is not Brees's game, but he is nothing if not accurate. I think the problem is that they were completely outcoached and had little practice at the short passing game, and the WRs were constantly out of position. Again this comes back to the coach - why didnt he change his game plan? It was flawed from the outset and the more he played it the happier and more confident the Colts became.

    So in the end I cant really hand it to the Ponies, as much as they did play a good game (really do like Addai) the real reason they looked so good was the Saints were absolutely dreadful. Luckily they play Tampa next week and may shine briefly, but last nights game showed their limitations and as a result I cant see the playoffs in their immediate future with what they brought to Indie's dome.
  26. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    8-0 in the dome last year, IIRC. They did not have a winning record on the road (4-4).

    Hopefully, this year they will be no better than 7-1 at home.

    The defense looked okay to me. Sanders was terrific. But as a RB, Reggie isn't any better than he was last year. They did good stopping Duece, though.

    Too early to make any predictions as to which defense they have, one like last year's regular season, or one like they had in the playoffs.
  27. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    Always a tough question to answer...
  28. Halifax_Pats_Fan

    Halifax_Pats_Fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,000
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Look, #12 lite them up last year to the tune on 30 + points with Caldwell and Gaffney.

    WHy would I not think that #12 can do it again, with Welker, Stallworth and Moss.

    Come on people it was one game.

    Let's not forget who our team is.

    Last night did not show me something that i did not already see.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2007
  29. sieglo

    sieglo Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,241
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    BB has designed the 2007 Patriots to beat the Colts.

    I'm not worried. In BB I trust.
  30. satz

    satz Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    The defence did good against saints for few reasons

    1)They were playing shallow cover 2 with 8 man fronts and they did not goto max protect formation and send 2 WR deep.
    2)Trying to run around smaller+faster defenders instead through them.
    3)When the LOS was being lost they did not put 3WR ,bush in the slot and duece in the backfield spreading the 8/9 man fronts helping the OL.
    4)When one is having trouble running they did not put brees in shotgun for entire drives with 4 WR.

    their entire defence is setup for shallow cover 2 if you spread them and create matchup problems this would have been a fun game instead it was very sad to see .
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page