there are many on the left side of the spectrum here who try to bash Romney for his heartless corporate reorganization that leads to outsourcing work that supposedly occured during his time at Bain. before being critical of anyone in this regard, people should understand that the outsourcing that happens is largely at the hand of bipartisan legislation including things like NAFTA that had a direct hand in the way globalization is evolving.......I say evolving because such as is obvious with China, over time, the industrialization of a 3rd world country happens in stages. First the commitment to jobs must happen, then the jobs get filled, then people in that country are better off and return the progress by buying more products from teh rest of the world......or so the theory goes. yes, there is alot of cost cutting and profiteering corporation can make in this process jsut as countless companies and politicians got ridiculously rich from the big dig.... and yet in the end, people still benefit. If the democrats have an issue with outsourcing, then they should not take it out on Romney, but they should rather take it out on Clinton because out of recent presidents, his contribution to globalization leads all other presidents. so the question to the democrats is: "Do you still have the patience within you to see globalization through, or is it time to reassess the legislation and consider more protectionism?" democrats need to be careful how they answer this because if they choose protectionism, then their theory of 'fairness to all' only goes as far as the border and will represent a shift much larger in magnitude and visibility than the no god/god thing. so in short, what Romney has done when it comes to outsourcing is basically what the democrats were complicit in when it comes to the goals of globalization.