Welcome to PatsFans.com

The economy this week

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by patsfan13, Jun 16, 2011.

  1. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14

    416,000 lost their jobs this week as the recovery continues.

    Came across a couple of articles this week that are linked and demonstrates the cluelessness of the current administration.

    Obama had a jobs summit / photo op with his "Jobs Council" headed by the CEO of GE (lots of taxpayer $$$$ for 'renewable energy' but they paid no taxes sweet huh?). There solution to the jobs situation.....wait.......2B for remedial training of HS grads (I was confused by that because the administration and the NEA tell us what a wonderful job our teachers are doing to earn their cadillac pensions).

    This is because there are all these manufacturing jobs that can't be filled....or so they say.

    The Obama Job Lies Pile Up - John Ransom - Townhall Finance



    This is probably news to all the manufacturing workers that have been laid off and are out of work.

    But then there is this report from the Philly Fed:


     
  2. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,485
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +916 / 6 / -9

    Wow, this is really fascinating stuff. Yet another thread with cherry picked articles meant to make the President look bad. I really wasn't expecting this from you, PF13.

    PS: where is your link for the 416k figure?
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2011
  3. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14

    US Dept of Labor, as reported on CNBC at 8:30 am, btw this is the tenth consecutive week of 400,000+ people losing their jobs.
     
  4. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,197
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Ratings:
    +3,000 / 28 / -22

    #75 Jersey

    Economics 101 remedial Course for Patsfan13:

    That is not the net number.

    In a 21st century economy, people lose jobs and people gain jobs. Looking at only one side of the fraction is a different ballgame in today's more job mobile economy than it was in 1970's "work for one company and retire after 40 years with a gold watch" economy.

    Last month's NET number was a huge disappointment, because the economy added ONLY 54,000 jobs net.

    If the economy loses even more jobs next month (let's say 500,000 new claims), but gains 750,000 new jobs (for a net of positive 250,000) that would be a very good thing.

    The NET number is the important one. Anything else is just you spinning.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2011
  5. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14




    The net number from the recent Non Farm reports the past few months are lower than the number of people entering the work force each month.


    THAT is the important number.
     
  6. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,485
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +916 / 6 / -9

    That's okay. The unemployed can always rely on Mitt Romney's empathy to get them through these trying times.
     
  7. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14

  8. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,485
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +916 / 6 / -9

    I'd like to your alternative vision. All I hear from the GOP is more tax cuts and less regulation. Doesn't really strike me as a particularly novel or effective strategy.

    And yeah, if the economy is going the right direction, Obama will be fine. If not, he'll be threatened, but might win anyway due to the lack of a credible challenger.
     
  9. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14

  10. Titus Pullo

    Titus Pullo Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -1

    2005:

    Us: Too many people, not enough resources, too much deregulation, cooked books and outsourcing... This country is heading for skyrocketing unemployment and an economic crash not seen in 75 years, ... and there's nothing the next president can do about it.

    You: Relax, chicken little. Everything is fine. The markets are strong, and will remain so.​

    2011:

    You: The country is falling apart.

    Us: Told ya. Even the IMF is admitting the age of growth is over.

    You: It would be different if the socialist wasn't president.​

    /facepalm
     
  11. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    9,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Well that's better than relying on the idiocy of Barack Obama. He's a completely clueless moron.
     
  12. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,197
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Ratings:
    +3,000 / 28 / -22

    #75 Jersey

    Patsfan13 once again judging stock markets based on multi-week moves.

    Obama came in at Dow 7900, son. Oh, the humanity, the Dow is now down to 11,900!!!!

    For those of Patsfan13's ilk with very short attention spans, the markets did the very same swoon in the May-July period last year also. 2010 ended up a very strong market year.
     
  13. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14



    2005: 160B

    2011: 1.6T deficit

    :rolleyes:
     
  14. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,197
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Ratings:
    +3,000 / 28 / -22

    #75 Jersey

    Another enlightening post by the resident graffiti artist.

    Are you in high school?
     
  15. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,197
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Ratings:
    +3,000 / 28 / -22

    #75 Jersey

    1/20/2001: 237b Surplus, Dow 11,000, American economy unmatched in the world and at peace.

    1/20/2009: 455b Deficit, Dow 7,900, American economy in tatters and in 2 wars.

    Game. Set. Match.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2011
  16. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    9,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Could a moderator please explain to me how this is not a personal attack? :confused:
     
  17. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,618
    Likes Received:
    171
    Ratings:
    +465 / 12 / -14



    You should recalibrate to when Pelosi and Reid took over congress with their insane a** clown party.

    ie 2007....


    Then again another indication of how thing went when Pelosi & Reid took control:


    The average cost of a house relative to the price of gold, see the 8-% decline.....

    [​IMG]
     
  18. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,197
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Ratings:
    +3,000 / 28 / -22

    #75 Jersey

    They "took control" in 2007?

    Wow, PF13, I missed all those liberal laws they shoved down that poor weakling George W. Bush's throat in those two years. Man, that was amazing how they overrode his vetoes and got all those laws passed that he opposed.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2011
  19. Titus Pullo

    Titus Pullo Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -1

    THAT is your response? Replete with rolling eyed emote? LOL.

    This above is like saying that a cancer patient's accelerated symptoms years after diagnosis indicate he only recently got sick.

    My goodness, are you ever horrible at this. Lazy, partisan rationalizations aren't "winning," sorry.

    Just admit you were warned of this outcome years ago, that you were dead wrong (as always) in denying it was coming, and are only slapping a partisan explanation on it today for affect.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2011
  20. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    9,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Actually what he said is absolutely nothing at all like that.
    My gawd, are you ever horrible at this with your lazy, partisan analogies which don't make no sense.
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>