Welcome to PatsFans.com

The Cackling Cuckold Enters Chameleon Mode

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by QuiGon, Oct 18, 2007.

  1. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Whatever happened to the woman who changed her name to Hillary "Rodham" Clinton the day after her husband won election in 1992..? Where's our uppity feminist looking to socialize our health care system..?

    Oh yeah... she, like all liberals, knows she can't get elected for what she really is. She has to pretend to be something she's not to pull the wool over the voters' eyes.

    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/a...n_shows_femininity_to_court_key_constituency/

    MANCHESTER, N.H. - Everywhere she goes, Hillary Clinton asks voters to help her make history as the first woman president.

    Yet Clinton is increasingly portraying herself more as motherly and traditional than as trailblazing and feminist, sometimes playing up the differences between men and women.

    And at the AFL-CIO Democratic forum in Chicago in August, the most memorable moment was Clinton's buoyant declaration to the union faithful that if they wanted a winner, "I'm your girl."
  2. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +142 / 1 / -4

    No different that the Connecticut effete Bush who went to Phillips Academy in Andover pretending to be a good old boy from Texas. His friend, the former President of Mexico called him a "windshield cowboy" who is "afraid of horses":

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/21/wbush121.xml

    So, what you just said about liberals, I think applies to most candidates. The smart ones position themselves to appeal to at least 51% of the voters.
  3. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    There's a surprise... a liberal can't defend against what I have said, so they simply respond with an attack on Bush, Rush, Fox News, etc...

    Never seen that tactic before :rolleyes:
  4. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +142 / 1 / -4

    If you read more carefully, you would see that I'm agreeing with what you said, but adding that it applies not only to liberals, but to conservatives as well. I do not think your point needed to be partisan.
  5. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,731
    Likes Received:
    125
    Ratings:
    +249 / 3 / -2

    Hillary is so fony, and so finger in the wind, it's pathetic. That woman would sell her children if it meant getting elected.
  6. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Whatever you say, old buddy..!! All I know is I laughed myself silly when you, of all people, called someone else "effete". So it was well worth the time and energy... :rofl:
  7. fleabassist1

    fleabassist1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

  8. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +142 / 1 / -4

    To paraphrase you --

    There's a surprise... QuiGon can't defend against what I have said, so he simply responds by calling me names.

    Never seen that tactic before :rolleyes:
  9. STFarmy

    STFarmy Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    I'm with Patters; most policians try to appeal to as many people as possible. It's something prevalent in both parties. I think Hilary is worse than most, but Romney's doing it a lot too.
  10. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,731
    Likes Received:
    125
    Ratings:
    +249 / 3 / -2

    Pandering is to be expected. You, as in a candidate, have to try to appeal to a broad range of voters. In doing so, you will pander a bit. I can handle that, but what I can't handle, is being a FRAUD! Like being for the war before being against it, or being pro-choice but all of a sudden being pro-life, etc.. Some pandering is reality, changing your stripes is crossing the line. Romney is a fraud, and Hillary is a finger in the wind fony. I'd much prefer someone who panders a little, but stands up and says this is what I am. At least that way I know where someone stands, and can decide whether I like them or not. I'm more apt to vote for someone I don't agree with on some issues, because I think they are firm in their beliefs. The people who talk out of both sides of their mouth are the ones I fear the most.
  11. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,731
    Likes Received:
    125
    Ratings:
    +249 / 3 / -2

    I got this email the other day. I knew what the answers were after the first question.


    A little history lesson. If you don't know the answer make your best guess.
    Answer all the questions before looking at the answers.

    Who said it?

    1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

    A. Karl Marx
    B. Adolph Hitler
    C. Joseph Stalin
    D. None of the above

    2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the
    few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."


    A. Lenin
    B. Mussolini
    C. Idi Amin
    D. None of the Above

    3) "(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something
    has to be taken away from some people."


    A. Nikita Khrushev
    B. Josef Goebbels
    C. Boris Yeltsin
    D. None of the above

    4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground."

    A. Mao Tse Dung
    B. Hugo Chavez
    C. Kim Jong Il
    D. None of the above

    5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."

    A. Karl Marx
    B. Lenin
    C. Molotov
    D. None of the above

    6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most
    profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."


    A. Pinochet
    B. Milosevic
    C. Saddam Hussein
    D. None of the above


    Scroll down for answers

















    Answers

    (1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
    (2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
    (3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
    (4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
    (5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
    (6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005

    Be afraid, Be very afraid!!


    http://youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-lMZxjo
  12. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Um, where did I call you a name in that post..? I laughed at the name you called Bush, and the irony contained therein, but I didn't call you anything at all. I resent your statement, although I am rather used to your outright lies by now.
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2007
  13. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +142 / 1 / -4

    The email you received is a typical right-wing distortion done by taking her comments completely out of context. Here's the context:

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/marxist.asp

    Don't trust the right wing. There are a great many documented liars and distorters among them.
  14. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    His comments are a heck of a lot more in context than all the lies you gladly spread about Rush Limbaugh, completely distorting his "phony soldiers" comment.

    Of course, you're too partisan to admit that which everyone knows.
  15. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +142 / 1 / -4

    To paraphrase you --

    There's a surprise... a conservative can't defend against what I have said, so they simply respond by bringing up something unrelated.

    Never seen that tactic before :rolleyes:

    As far as your other comment, it sounded like you were calling me effete.
  16. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,731
    Likes Received:
    125
    Ratings:
    +249 / 3 / -2

    Um, it says, and for some reason you can't copy and paste, that the quote is accurate. That the context is misleading. Really? I don't really see how it is? She said to a crowd that she was going to repeal the tax cuts in order to give that money for the common good. So what's misleading about that?
  17. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Likes Received:
    113
    Ratings:
    +142 / 1 / -4

    Yeah, she said to a very wealthy group that she's going to repeal their tax cuts. The quote, isolated, makes it sound like she's about to wage a revolution, when all she's talking about is standard Democratic tax policy, that the wealthy should pay more in taxes.

    Isolated, We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" could be read as a collectivist statement or even worse if you don't know that she's referring only to tax breaks that disproportionately benefited the rich.
  18. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    26,731
    Likes Received:
    125
    Ratings:
    +249 / 3 / -2

    It's not isolated when she's made the same remarks about corporate profits. This is what she believes in. She's a socialist, and borderline communist. She clearly believes in that form of government. From taxing about taxing for the "common good", or confiscating corporate profits, to government run health care. She's truly scary.
  19. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,845
    Likes Received:
    90
    Ratings:
    +151 / 3 / -19

    Anyone who defends Rush, his half truths and lies is very over the edge.. suggest you get some balance into your political diet, if not you will get all backed up. Rush changed his whole statement on the "phony soldiers" too lazy to look for it right now, but it is out there.
  20. QuiGon

    QuiGon Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I get plenty of balance - and I guarantee it's far more than you do.
    Well, he explained what he meant to completely refute the lying liberals but he never changed his statement from the moment he said it to the present day. So we'll just chalk that up as another liberal lie... oh, but it's "out there".... you're just "too lazy to look it up"... :rofl: But it's there, I tell ya..!! It is it is..!!

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>