Welcome to PatsFans.com

Thank you deviants.

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by atomdomb, Jun 19, 2008.

  1. atomdomb

    atomdomb Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    767
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    A national treasure is ruined by deviants.(mostly homosexuals) Why?

    http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080613/NEWS/806130324

    In the past decade, the number of complaints about explicit, open public sex in the Provincetown and Truro portions of the national park has more than tripled, Seashore acting chief ranger Craig Thatcher said. The activity ranges from flashing to masturbation to men's outdoor orgies, he said.

    An example of the complaints was a call reporting Wednesday that a 65- to 70-year-old man was flashing people at Herring Cove Beach, according to Seashore records.

    In a Sept. 19, 2007, letter, a New Jersey family walking with children in the dunes encountered "several couples and then a large group of men having group sex in the nude, including oral and anal sex right out in the open."

    In an August 2007 letter, a whale-watch boat captain leaving Provincetown Harbor with passengers reported seeing 20 to 30 nude men "playing around" near Wood End Lighthouse.


    Provincetown and the beaches are some of the most beautiful places in the world, and now with that beautiful sunset you can watch men having anal sex. Ah, nature. WTF!
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2008
  2. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,277
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +72 / 3 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    Re: Thank you Homos.

    I remember a couple of beaches being closed in the 70's because of this. There's a Reservoir in Southern Vermont (Harriman)that alot of people go swimming, picnicking,and sailing at,beutifull place. It was almost closed down for the same reason but the locals that swim there took it into they're own hands and booted the guys out.
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2008
  3. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Thank you Homos.

    I'm not sure we need some of the language used in this thread. How about simply being respectful? It doesn't really cost anything.
  4. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,879
    Likes Received:
    156
    Ratings:
    +214 / 6 / -7

    Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    Atomdomb, Change the title or the thread will be closed. "Thank you homos" is no more acceptable than a thread about child abuse in the Catholic Church titled, "Thank you Christians" or a thread about a black criminal that said, "Thank you black people." You could call it, for instance, "Thank you perverts."

    I'm told you might not be able to edit it, so I changed the title myself. If you don't like it, tell me, and I'll closed the thread.
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2008
  5. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    How is "perverts" any better?
  6. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,879
    Likes Received:
    156
    Ratings:
    +214 / 6 / -7

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    It's not against the rules to call people who have sex in public perverts, but to imply that gays in general are responsible for that kind of behavior is against the rules.
  7. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    Just for the record, I don't think "deviants" is any better.
  8. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    27,008
    Likes Received:
    194
    Ratings:
    +449 / 5 / -2

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    Cuz perverts doesn't single out an entire group like saying homosexuals does. It's not all gays that are out there "ruining" it for atom. It's a bunch of perverts who are. Patters is absolutely correct here.
  9. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,834
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +23 / 0 / -0

    #80 Jersey

    can't peeps get a room?
  10. atomdomb

    atomdomb Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    767
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Re: Thank you Homos.

    most of the language is from the Cape Cod Times. I only added the word Homos. The article implied and mentioned homos as the principle perpetrators of the public sex. The title should have read, "Thank you Homos 80% of the time and the occasional straight couple. Changing the title doesn't change the fact that Homosexuality has ruined Ptown for most straight people.
  11. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    Given the title of the thread and the general tone regarding homosexuals etc, it just seemed that saying "perverts" gave the appearance of saying that homosexuals were perverts, just as the new title would seem to indicate they're deviants.

    That's what I was talking about--because the OP never mentioned any straight people out there giving blow jobs or anything. See what I mean, vern?
  12. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,569
    Likes Received:
    184
    Ratings:
    +445 / 10 / -11

    #24 Jersey

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    Of course homosexuals are deviants :

    "deviating or departing from the norm"

    They clearly fit the definition.
  13. atomdomb

    atomdomb Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    767
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    the article does mention "couples" as in a few couples. they could possible be normal couples. let's assume they are for a moment. the family from NJ sees a few normal couples having sex(unacceptable) and then the group 30-40? gay men. it's obvious this story is about homosexuals. sugar coating the title doesn't hide the obvious problem on the beach.
  14. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    <<holding up both hands in front of my chest, palms out and backing slowly out of the room...

    :eek:
  15. Patriot_in_NY

    Patriot_in_NY Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,543
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +31 / 0 / -0

    I betting this thread is locked by post #20, any takers? :D
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2008
  16. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    So are you now the arbiter of what's "normal" and what isn't? Is what you do with your wife "normal"? Are you sure?

    The story said they were playing around, it didn't say they were fornicating (I wanted to say *******...but you know how it is). They could've been playing volleyball as a group and someone figured it was offensive. You don't know.
  17. scout

    scout Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,713
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 0 / -2

    #15 Jersey

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    So Atombomb, if they clear up this beach problem, it sounds like your packing and headed to Ptown.
  18. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Putting On My Moderator's Hat

    Hell, he might be just using this to advertise...if you know what I mean...
  19. Lifer

    Lifer Banned

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    remember this from Patters to start his "Evangelical Biographer endorses Obama thread?

    "Not exactly thrilled that Obama is making inroads with religious types because, obviously, the more they enter the Democratic Party, the more the Democratic Party will consider even their wrongheaded views."

    its ok i guess to stereotype all "religious types" as all thinking and behaving the same way, just dont do it to a group Patters belongs to.
  20. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,879
    Likes Received:
    156
    Ratings:
    +214 / 6 / -7

    Yes, though I should have been more clear and referred to religious conservatives. At any rate, objecting to religious types influencing the political process is not the same as objecting to religious people or religion. I believe strongly in the separation of church and state, and don't support effort to make our nation officially Christian, display nativity scenes at courthouses, and so on. Those are political objections. Do I have anything against someone's devotion to God? No. Do I have anything against religion in general? No. But, when religion enters politics it often does more harm than good -- from the time that the Bible was used to defend slavery to the time it was used to argue against the women's vote to the time it was used to argue against mixed marriages to the time it is used to argue against gay rights. But, if some church wants to preach messages I disagree with, I respect their right, because I have the right to challenge them on both political and religious grounds.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>