Kdo5
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
- Messages
- 18,336
- Reaction score
- 15,324
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Kdo5 said:He looked badly in pain. Anyone have any word on his injury? It looked pretty serious but I hope thats not the case.
Kdo5 said:He looked badly in pain. Anyone have any word on his injury? It looked pretty serious but I hope thats not the case.
I'm inclined to think that way to, with both Tebucky and Gus.mgteich said:The question is whether to keep him on the roster with expectation of him coming back after the bye. I would think that the answer is "yes", although we could cut him and sign him when he's healthy. It is unlikely that anyone else will sign him.
Box_O_Rocks said:I'm inclined to think that way to, with both Tebucky and Gus.
Sorry, the last sentence stuck in my mind. I had Tebucky not making the 53, if we release him and keep him on speed dial while he heals, then we can bring him back if injuries start taking a toll. The same with Gus whom I thought hasn't played that badly for us.mgteich said:You agree with keeping them on the 53, or cutting and hoping to get them back?
Box_O_Rocks said:Sorry, the last sentence stuck in my mind. I had Tebucky not making the 53, if we release him and keep him on speed dial while he heals, then we can bring him back if injuries start taking a toll. The same with Gus whom I thought hasn't played that badly for us.
Yes, but it is my impression that the Pats are getting stronger reserves, certainly you could make that case at S, even with Mitchell on IR. Hawkins and Sanders seem to be a very slight step down from Rodey and Geno. With Andrews being groomed for the 6th WR slot, I don't see a strong role for Tebucky or Gus beyond STs, but they would both be excellent shadow players, especially if they need a few weeks to heal.mgteich said:Yes, both are fine special teamers. It is indeed bb's style to assemble a Shadow Roster, although I seem to recall Cherry and Chatham making the 53 under similar circumstances.
Box_O_Rocks said:Yes, but it is my impression that the Pats are getting stronger reserves, certainly you could make that case at S, even with Mitchell on IR. Hawkins and Sanders seem to be a very slight step down from Rodey and Geno. With Andrews being groomed for the 6th WR slot, I don't see a strong role for Tebucky or Gus beyond STs, but they would both be excellent shadow players, especially if they need a few weeks to heal.
I've loved how Andrews looks at gunner so far. Chad Scott is the best gunner blocker I've noted - and I love it when they have him up in press and he hammers the WR. I found it interesting to see Britt back as a blocker on KRs; Neal has always done that too. Wright reportedly had a nice smackdown on kick coverage tonight. Spann got his name mentioned twice on coverage tackles, if it came down to him and Warfield for my 6th CB, I'd be considering that - though I think we can get him to the Practice Squad.mgteich said:I agree that Tebucky and Guss are/were here for special teams only. We are getting a bit thin on special teams, though Andrews is a great addition, and may be our best gunner.
Box_O_Rocks said:I've loved how Andrews looks at gunner so far. Chad Scott is the best gunner blocker I've noted - and I love it when they have him up in press and he hammers the WR. I found it interesting to see Britt back as a blocker on KRs; Neal has always done that too. Wright reportedly had a nice smackdown on kick coverage tonight. Spann got his name mentioned twice on coverage tackles, if it came down to him and Warfield for my 6th CB, I'd be considering that - though I think we can get him to the Practice Squad.
OT: Warfield reportedly got burned deep on a pass play, could you see if he was supposed to have S help over top?
Warfield has been intriguing...and I'm the original Hank Poteat Bandwagon Bongo Boy!mgteich said:I don't recall whether Warfield was supposed to ahve safety help. Spann is a perfect Practice Squad player.
Let's count defensive backs.
CORNERS: Samuel, Hobbs, Gay, Chad Scott, Andrews
SAFETIES: Harrison, Wilson, Hawkins, Sanders
We might now keep Warfield. It really depends on how much he is catching on to the system in practice. I might be tempted to keep Hank instead of Poteat though. With Hank, we could cut him an bring him back after Game One.
Box_O_Rocks said:Warfield has been intriguing...and I'm the original Hank Poteat Bandwagon Bongo Boy!
Andrews at CB? I have him as a WR for now, but he gets carried no matter where he is on the depth chart. I like Warfield as a CB candidate because I think he can play some Safety if needed, once he gets the defense down. We may want to only go with 9 DBs + Andrews just to try and carry an extra LB. Hard choices, the way it should be.
Freeman, Roach, and Mays are easy cuts. I'll need to watch the game today to get a feel for things after 3 games, though I get more from the breakdowns when I can focus on each player and see how they are affected by their peers.mgteich said:I think 9 DB's plus Andrews is right, with Gay, Warfield and Poteat still competing for two of the spots. I don't know where to list Andrews. I should just list as a STer.
With 10 DB's, we likely have 17 front seven roster spots, with 6 locks at DL and 5 at LB (4 starters plus Bruschi). That leaves only six spots for
Thomas,Smith,Klecko,Freeman
Gardner,Beisel,Brown,Mincey,Woods,Mays,Alexander,Izzo,Davis and Roach
As say, it will be tough
Izzo, Davis, Gardner top Ster's
and three more
--------------------------
The good news is that Smith, Thomas,Mays and Roach are likely to be safe on the Practice Squad. Freeman will be gone in a couple of days.
WHICH GIVES US THREE OUT OF
Klecko, Beisel,Chad Brown,Mincey,Woods and Alexander
and we don't have any backup OLB's yet.
-----------------------------------------------------
BTW, we only get three if we leave the offense with only 23 slots, probably OK for now.
-----------------------------------------------
shakadave said:Tebucky's injury looked like an ankle to me. Whatever it was, it happened while he was running untouched with nobody near him --- all too reminiscent of Ty Law's foot injury at Pittsburgh in '04.
Warfield had nice defense on a long pass attempt into the end zone tonight.