Agree SB1, on the surface, that's what the 2011 stats show; but, diving a little deeper:
- In 2011 games Tebow started, the Broncos were officially 3 for 5.
- One of those 2 point conversions involved the holder trying to run after a botched snap.
- In the other 4 attempts, Denver went 3 for 3 on runs, and 0 for 1 on passes.
In the end, the actual 2 PT Conversion rate for the Broncos with Tebow under center was 75%. With as many touchdowns as the Brady-led Pats tally each year (averaging 57 TD's / yr in 2007/9/10/11/12). With a 2 PT Conv % of 65% or 75%, the Pats could score an extra 1 to 2 points per game (see the table I put together below). It would be an option to consider.
(clipped)
What difference could 1-2 extra points per game make? Maybe none; but, one of the 2012 LOSSES might have been a WIN if the Pats had 1 extra point with a commitment to a
2-PT over XP philosophy:
See below and the BoxScore from the
Week 3 1-point loss to the Ravens:
(clipped)
The Pats only scored 1 touchdown against the Ravens in Week 3. See score and scoring summary below. If the Pats had converted a 2PT Conversion on that touchdown, the Ravens would have been kicking a FG to Tie instead of win the game and force overtime.
(clipped)
Hey, hindsight is 20/20 for sure. Any game day philosophical change to a
2-PT over XP approach would have to be weighed against other considerations (disruption to normal XP game flow, etc.). I personally would love to see a team make a wholesale switch to 2-PT Conversions; but, I'm not a fan of the '
kicking game' in general.
My 2 cents.