No dodge. Per usual, you aren't capable of understanding basic logic.
Basic logic is when you won't admit you are wrong when you contradict yourself, you critize me? OK.
OMG, you really are that friggin dense. I stated them in no particular order. I also stated that there were a FEW reasons. No where did I claim that NEAL was the PRIMARY reason. And my response was in a rebuttal to Slappy claiming that YATES was the only reason we lost. Do yourself a favor and know what you are talking about when you decide to respond.
No, you stated them in order. You did not say, in no particular order. But regardless of order, you state that reason clearly.
If you listed a couple of reasons, clearly they were primary reasons.
I never said that not having Neal was a PRIMARY reason. That was YOU making a SWA assumption.
You listed him as one of 3. The other 2 were the OL being sick (ie excuse) and the in the grasp. If there are 3 reasons in your mind, and one is a single play how do you claim the loss of a player that you listed as one of the only 3 reasons you came up with is not a primary reason?
And no, they don't necessarily conflict with one another.
Only to someone who refuses to admit they are wrong.
Fact is that Yates played well in passing plays, but not as well on running plays. That doesn't mean he played BAD. And his play didn't affect Koppen or Mankins play
.
By definition if Yates play wasn't a reason we lost, then your claim that losing Neal was is wrong.
It is intellectually impossible for Neal being lost to be a reason we lost and the play of his replacement to not be a reason we lost. You are claiming both and it is literally impossible for you to be right about both.
You are saying 2+2=4 AND 2+2=5 and both are right. Grow a set and admit it.
No, I didn't post the words. What you are claiming and what I actually said are two different things.
A lie.
Unlike you, Andy, I admit my errors. Always have.
If that were the case, you could easily find multiple examples where you posted on this board that you were wrong.
I challenge your credibility to find 3 posts where you admitted to being wrong on this board. I challenge you. I'm asking for 3 out of thousands of posts.
I'm sure you will come up with some excuse about how hard it is to find them, but I CHALLENGE your credibility to find 3 examples where you admit you were wrong becuase you just said you always do.
Again, never claiming it was a PRIMARY reason.
When you name 3 only, they are all primary.
I said it was one of a few.
Same thing but if you want to call it that, it STILL contradicts your statement that Neal not playing was a reason, yet the play of Yates was not. That is physicallly and intellectually impossible.
Helps if you actually read what was posted and don't put words in people's mouths.
I did read it, and in fact used your own words in my reply.
But, then, that is the only way you "win" arguments on here. Make erroneous claims and then build a weak argument around it.
I could care less about 'winning arguments' which is why you dont see my posts, unlike yours, ripping and insulting everyone who replies.
You are a one trick pony. Every one who disagrees either 'is wrong' or gets insulted. You bring no insight, you simpy post a ****eyed opinion, and insult anyone who (correctly) disagrees.
Perhaps you should drop the anger and defenisvieness and post your opinion, then respect the opinions that do not agree. You are disagreed with more than anyone on this board, yet you act like a total dlck to anyone who disagrees. That is a you problem. I have tried to explain that to you before, and you just seem to want to fight everyone.
Good luck with all of that.