- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Messages
- 2,956
- Reaction score
- 126
Consider If PATs have say 8M in CAP space left that they never spend
this year. That would mean they are 8M richer this year.
Then apply that to Seymour's 18.66 Option bonus making his out of pocket
cost next year only 10M compared to the 18M if the PATs had spent to
the CAP this year.
Of course that is if they don't spend to the CAP this which is becoming hard
to see happen even with extending Branch.
Is this a way to manipulate costs? Have the PAT s found a way to reduce
the affect of Seymour's BIG contract if this happens?
this year. That would mean they are 8M richer this year.
Then apply that to Seymour's 18.66 Option bonus making his out of pocket
cost next year only 10M compared to the 18M if the PATs had spent to
the CAP this year.
Of course that is if they don't spend to the CAP this which is becoming hard
to see happen even with extending Branch.
Is this a way to manipulate costs? Have the PAT s found a way to reduce
the affect of Seymour's BIG contract if this happens?