- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33,965
- Reaction score
- 14,423
Okay, for everybody talking about a "legitimate deep threat" and Caldwell "benefitting from the system," I have to note, Papier Reche is fast as hell. I think he clocked sub 4.4, maybe sub 4.3, straight line speed. He showed it over the season with the Pats.
The point is, it's not that we need one from column A, one from column B, etc. etc. It's more that we have a few good guys, a few unproven who might be good, no great receivers, and no need for a great receiver. Sorry, but unless we catch one on the way up, the Pats' salary logic, and the salary logic of a "great receiver," are not in synch, from what I can tell.
Moving on to Dante, he's sort of a 1b type guy (not a proven #1 like a Harrison or a TO [sic,] but a recent breakout guy,) I don't know what he gets offered in FA. Should we make a run at him? Sure. But my gut says someone is going to pay him to be a true 1, even if Philly won't.
Beyond that in terms of deal structure, he's going to be looking for money up-front, and he's a pay-as-you-go or backloaded guy if you ask me. You pay him a big bonus, and that's paying money today for performance you might never see. That's a risk for anybody, but he's got high risk written all over him, and you can not accept that risk up-front with an injury-prone player; you mitigate it with backloaded money and incentives, if you're smart. Unfortunately, up-front money is the name of the game. Ergo, if you ask me, no Dante.
Finally - yes, yes, yes to adding Bennett if we can get him at 2 money (say, 4-5M/yr, modest bonus.) If he's looking for 8M a year? I don't know how we end up justifying it. And yes, it's too early to give up on Chad.
PFnV
The point is, it's not that we need one from column A, one from column B, etc. etc. It's more that we have a few good guys, a few unproven who might be good, no great receivers, and no need for a great receiver. Sorry, but unless we catch one on the way up, the Pats' salary logic, and the salary logic of a "great receiver," are not in synch, from what I can tell.
Moving on to Dante, he's sort of a 1b type guy (not a proven #1 like a Harrison or a TO [sic,] but a recent breakout guy,) I don't know what he gets offered in FA. Should we make a run at him? Sure. But my gut says someone is going to pay him to be a true 1, even if Philly won't.
Beyond that in terms of deal structure, he's going to be looking for money up-front, and he's a pay-as-you-go or backloaded guy if you ask me. You pay him a big bonus, and that's paying money today for performance you might never see. That's a risk for anybody, but he's got high risk written all over him, and you can not accept that risk up-front with an injury-prone player; you mitigate it with backloaded money and incentives, if you're smart. Unfortunately, up-front money is the name of the game. Ergo, if you ask me, no Dante.
Finally - yes, yes, yes to adding Bennett if we can get him at 2 money (say, 4-5M/yr, modest bonus.) If he's looking for 8M a year? I don't know how we end up justifying it. And yes, it's too early to give up on Chad.
PFnV
Last edited: