Welcome to PatsFans.com

Speculation: Matt Cassel back to the Patriots?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by KDPPatsfan85, Feb 13, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KDPPatsfan85

    KDPPatsfan85 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,666
    Likes Received:
    93
    Ratings:
    +196 / 7 / -30

    #24 Jersey

    Dont shoot the messenger(me);)

    Matt Cassel - Kansas City Chiefs - 2013 Player Profile - Rotoworld.com

     
  2. kennyb

    kennyb Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    49
    Ratings:
    +158 / 73 / -37

    I would only sign him for vet min or slightly more. Given that he's made huge money over his contract, I don't know if he'd want to keep playing for that little money.

    It might be interesting to have him play TE or something in addition to backup QB. Maybe give him some incentives for that. All for the team. Test his loyalty.
     
  3. PatsDeb

    PatsDeb PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    65
    Ratings:
    +129 / 0 / -1

    I don't think this will wash. At this point the Pats have to be thinking about making sure TFB's replacement is on the roster. I don't think his replacement will be Matt Cassell, who proved in KC that he can't carry a team. I think the Pats hold onto Mallett, continue to groom him, and if he's that good, continue to go with only 2 QBs on the roster.
     
  4. Fencer

    Fencer Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    8,334
    Likes Received:
    133
    Ratings:
    +411 / 6 / -20

    #12 Jersey

    This presupposes some other team would want Mallett over Cassel.

    Umm -- why would they?
     
  5. PatsDeb

    PatsDeb PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    65
    Ratings:
    +129 / 0 / -1

    Wouldn't you want Mallett over Cassel at this point? It's the promise of a QB who might be great (although he hasn't shown anything yet) vs. one you've seen and would rather not see any more of.
     
  6. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,896
    Likes Received:
    390
    Ratings:
    +992 / 72 / -55

    #50 Jersey

    Youth. Potential. Improvement from one Pre-season to the next. Mallett was talked about as a 1st rounder for a reason. He fell because of "character" rumors. Rumors that turned out to be false.

    Cassel is damaged goods right now. He's confidence is shot because of the number of hits he was taking behind the poor KC O-line the last few years. And because of his injuries.

    I could see the Pats adding Cassel even if they keep Mallett.. From the standpoint that he excelled under McDaniels.
     
  7. IllegalContact

    IllegalContact Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    316
    Ratings:
    +1,026 / 30 / -34

    of course they would....cassel sucks
     
  8. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    21,638
    Likes Received:
    597
    Ratings:
    +1,618 / 20 / -10

    #3 Jersey

    Most of Cassel's problems in KC were Pioli's fault.
     
  9. IllegalContact

    IllegalContact Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    316
    Ratings:
    +1,026 / 30 / -34

    did pioli draw up the plays? did he force cassel to look stupid? pics of his mom or something?
     
  10. Palm Beach Pats Fan

    Palm Beach Pats Fan In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    3,583
    Likes Received:
    84
    Ratings:
    +292 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Really?

    No tape is better than putrid tape.
     
  11. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    44,561
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Ratings:
    +4,098 / 197 / -145

    Disable Jersey

    Because Cassel has been a borderline Pro Bowl QB when he's had a decent offensive line in front of him, and Mallet's been a borderline #2/#3 QB, but Cassel's probably looked at as damaged goods after last season. His confidence seemed shot almost from the beginning.

    Mallet, on the other hand, can throw the ball really hard.
     
  12. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,488
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +922 / 6 / -9

    Because Cassel sucks and Mallett might not?
     
  13. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    21,638
    Likes Received:
    597
    Ratings:
    +1,618 / 20 / -10

    #3 Jersey

    No, but he saddled Cassel with a terrible head coach (Haley) and OL, and then when he finally got an OC who could work with Cassel (Weis) he let his terrible head coach drive Weis to the NCAA.
     
  14. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    24,527
    Likes Received:
    1,003
    Ratings:
    +3,063 / 26 / -17

    Disable Jersey

    I am not joking here when I say that while I find Mattie to NE intriguing, I would want him to commit to spending extended sessions with a good sports psychologist as part of the deal. The KC experience damaged what was a career at its start.
     
  15. Fencer

    Fencer Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    8,334
    Likes Received:
    133
    Ratings:
    +411 / 6 / -20

    #12 Jersey

    One guy made the Pro Bowl (even if that's as sketchy as Pro Bowl invites get), and hasn't gotten wrecked PHYSICALLY since then, doesn't have addiction rumors about him, etc. The other has never accomplished much on an NFL field even in preseason, and nothing when the NFL games count.

    If money's the same, I go with the guy who's played well in the past.
     
  16. jmt57

    jmt57 Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,613
    Likes Received:
    273
    Ratings:
    +816 / 1 / -3


    I'm not going to shoot you, but I am going to follow to the original link and see what is up, in order to attempt to gain a bit of context.

    New England Patriots Mailbag: Who to target in free agency - ESPN Boston




    Q. Mike, why would the Pats possibly trade Ryan Mallett? Tom Brady has two years left at most! -- rezadude (San Diego, Calif.)

    A. The idea would be that if a team would give the Patriots a valuable draft chip, it would be worth it because Mallett has just two years left on his contract and would leave anyway after the 2014 season to pursue a starting job. Making the trade would also align with the thought that Brady has more than two years remaining to play at a high level, and that the backup job could be filled through other avenues (e.g. Matt Cassel, if released by the Chiefs).​




    So what we have is Mike Reiss responding to the often asked question about trading Ryan Mallett, and throwing Cassel's name out there as someone the Pats might look to sign if indeed Mallett were to be traded.


    Rotoworld is a wonderful site for compiling a lot of links to specific teams and players all in one place, but the analysis they add in sometimes leaves a bit to be desired. When you read the original column it is obvious that Reiss was just throwing a name out there if - if - Mallett were to be traded - and not genuinely speculating that Cassel would be returning to the Patriots.



    More telling is an explanation on the very next question as to why Mallett is unlikely to fetch enough value in return to make it worth trading him.


    Perhaps a better question would be whether or not Cassel would want to return to New England? Would he see himself as a possible successor to Brady? Or would he prefer to go to another team where he had a better chance to play sooner?
     
  17. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    9,059
    Likes Received:
    166
    Ratings:
    +299 / 1 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    I love the idea. Not sure what it would cost and if he would come cheap enough for me to still like it but from a pure back up stand point he is a very good option. As the eventual replacement for Tom hell no (maybe you can compete for the spot if your still around).

    IMO what you should be looking for in a back up QB is one of two things a developemental guy like Mallet or a vet with some experience who you think could give you at least .500 winning percentage so you could tread water for a 4-8 week period if your starter went down. It would be great to have better but then he would be starting somewhere.

    I dont see the need for Cassel to be QB3 so this would likely include a Mallet trade which if you assume a better pick then the 3rd rounder we originally invested than this is not a bad move.
     
  18. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,896
    Likes Received:
    390
    Ratings:
    +992 / 72 / -55

    #50 Jersey

    Brett Favre hadn't accomplished anything on the field when he was traded. In fact, all Favre had accomplished was throwing 2 interceptions and being sacked once.

    Mallett is sitting behind one of the greatest (if not THE GREATEST) QB to have ever played the game. And now, that is somehow a detriment to him? Because he hasn't surpassed Tom Brady?

    The fact that Belichick only went with TWO QBs, one of them being Mallett, when he's typically gone with 3, shows a level of confidence in Mallett that you rarely see from Head coaches, particularly ones with Belichick's pedigree.
     
  19. BradyManny

    BradyManny Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,041
    Likes Received:
    98
    Ratings:
    +339 / 5 / -1

    I would love to have Matty back. I know he's had struggles in KC, but he did have a Pro Bowl season there. He's a solid QB in a tough situation.

    If Brady were to get injured, you would have to feel much better about the team's chances with Cassel than the raw and unproven Mallet. Cassel played well with a similarly talented group of weapons in a similar offense in 2008. Granted we do not have Randy Moss to take the top off the defense, but otherwise, the offense attacks defenses in a similar way.
     
  20. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,488
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +922 / 6 / -9

    Until you know what you have in Mallett, I'm not sure how you could conclusively make this claim.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>