Welcome to PatsFans.com

sox get HEE SOP CHOI

Discussion in 'Red Sox Fan Forum' started by patsfan55, Mar 24, 2006.

  1. patsfan55

    patsfan55 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    dont know for who yet

    on espnnews bottom line

    does this mean we move youk back to third?
  2. patsfan55

    patsfan55 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    he was claimed off waivers
  3. Johnny Mac

    Johnny Mac Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I have no idea why the Dodgers would waive him. He has options left. Oh well, good for the Sox.
  4. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,857
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +49 / 2 / -0

    It means we've got the option to do so if Lowell falters.

    Choi was a starter so I'm guessing defensively he's decent defensively

    So Youkillis is probably the best out of Snow, Choi and Lowell offensively and can probably be counted on to see a lot of playing time.

    Then out of the remaining three you have a rotation depending on who the hotter bat might be at the time, as well as substituting for defensive play when we have a lead.

    Its not how I'd develop my team but it really seems like they are working hard to do the best with what they have.
  5. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    38,045
    Likes Received:
    291
    Ratings:
    +585 / 4 / -12

    #87 Jersey

    I applaud Theo for bringing some measure of competition to the team. No small feat when you have guarenteed contracts. In many ways Theo and Belichick operate similar in that are great believers in competition for a job.

    Choi is not going to mke us forget Mo Vaughn...but like I said...the man is trying at least.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>