Welcome to PatsFans.com

Should the Pats bring Brandon Lloyd back?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by ctpatsfan77, Feb 27, 2013.

?

Should the Pats bring Lloyd back?

Poll closed Mar 4, 2013.
  1. Absolutely

    37.0%
  2. Maybe

    50.0%
  3. Absolutely not

    13.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,412
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +181 / 4 / -5

    Mods: feel free to merge with one of the other threads, but I figured I'd ask the question.
  2. IllegalContact

    IllegalContact On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    10,783
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +256 / 4 / -8

    to me, it would depend on a few things:

    - if welker is re-signed, then take a step in the 'no' direction
    - if lloyd is as much a bummer in the locker room as being publicised, another step in the 'no' direction.

    but if the pats are resigning welker and are looking at someone like wallace, then it's already over
  3. randomk1

    randomk1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I have no idea how bad the issues are with him but i hope he comes back. If he is gone it leaves us kind of thin.
  4. Ivan

    Ivan On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    5,871
    Likes Received:
    172
    Ratings:
    +451 / 12 / -31

    #75 Jersey

    I buy the argument that the release is related to attitude and work ethic and don't think he should be in NE if that is the case.
  5. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 2 / -0

    I went with "Absolutely Not" though that's a little bit of a strong position for a guy who caught 74 passes and isn't costing a lot of money.

    Although I was much more interested in Wallace as a deep threat last year, outside of these troubling reports of Lloyd as a poor locker room presence, I don't consider him a failure, given the low cost.

    But when you have a guy as cheap as Lloyd and hear these reports - and you have Brady freeing up $15 million to "win now" - you have to feel a strong need to provide Brady with what he's lacked for the last several seasons - a strong vertical threat.

    Ironically that may wind up being someone like Wallace - who's dollar value dropped over last season and will no longer require the additional loss of draft picks.

    So if they're going to swap Lloyd for a true deep threat, then I'm all for him being let go - and I get the strong sense that's exactly what Belichick has planned.

    If it does wind up being Wallace, there's a lot of folks here who will be eating crow over the Lloyd/Wallace debate last year and about the Patriots not needing a deep threat - but from my perspective it's clear that Belichick knows Brady's game would benefit with someone who will stretch the field more than Lloyd did.
  6. SwedishPat

    SwedishPat Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    If the reports about him not being a good guy in the locker room is correct, then absolutely not bring him back. If they aren't correct, bring him back. He isn't too expensive and 900+ yards is not bad. It's not like we are loaded at the wr position either.
  7. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    Let me understand the folks who absolutely want Lloyd back. Presume that we re-sign Welker and Edelman in the next couple of weeks and expect to use one of our top 2 draft picks on a wide receiver.

    Why is Lloyd worth $5M of new money (and $3M next year). Is there no one else who MIGHT stretch the field better, have a higher YAC average and/or fit our needs better for $4M a year or for a bit more?
  8. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,460
    Likes Received:
    288
    Ratings:
    +746 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    Please look over the current FA list. Then get back to us with the names of all the players on it that you think will be better than Lloyd, for no more than the $5 million.
  9. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    I leave the choice of "better" to Belichick. If he can't find someone in the first week who is a better fit than Lloyd, then he'll pay Lloyd's option. It is by no means automatic.

    Also, Belichick is not restricted to paying only $5M: a couple of more in AAV works fine. After all, I presume that Welker's is essentially a 2 year contract. The additional WR's contract could be structured so that the near term cap impact is small.

    In fact, if Belichick is willing, a top wide receiver could be signed with an acceptable cap hit. Much can be said for signing a 5 year contract with a top receiver.

    The question is whether Belichick is willing to sign long-term help at this key position.



  10. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,460
    Likes Received:
    288
    Ratings:
    +746 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    So you bagged on people who looked at the current landscape and said absolutely, and you did it without any real alternate plans. Seems your position is far more questionable than theirs at this stage.
  11. Bravo777

    Bravo777 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,141
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Bring back the beast!
  12. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    Welker has to be re-signed or the Pats have real problems. I think Lloyd
    should be retained until the Pats have a better alternative talent wise.
    I'm surprised that so many people do not know the current value of WRs.
    Deon Branch signed a 5 mil./yr. contract back in 2006. Pierre Garcon signed
    a 8.5 mil./yr. last year. Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, and Vincent Jackson are in the 14-18 mil. catagory.
  13. pazrul72

    pazrul72 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    I voted maybe because absolutely yes is a bit too strong for how I feel. I lean that way because he proved he can produce in our system, something that has been increasingly rare lately. Without him the patriots are potentially dangerously thin at the position. So assuming the locker room issue is overblown I want him back. If they aren't overblown and he really is impossible to work with then no I want his money to go to somebody else. So without being in the locker room and knowing how that dynamic actually works I can not give an honest opinion.
  14. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    Reject my plan if you must.

    MY PLAN
    A) Sign Welker.
    B) Sign Edelman.
    C) Make a few dozen calls in the first week of free agency and then make a decision on Lloyd. Of course, this has already been done (but that would be illegal).
    D) Sign a WR to replace Lloyd if we decide not to pay his option, which option may be a major upgrade or simply a better fitting wide receiver.
    E) Bring in a dozen WR's for camp competition.
    F) Draft a wide receiver or two.


  15. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,376
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +99 / 2 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    I guess it depends on what's going on behind the scenes, which we just don't know at this point. It will be virtually impossible to replace his production for what he makes, so the only way that dropping him makes sense is if he's such a headache that the team views it as addition by subtraction.

    Seems strange that that would be the case, since it's not like he was an unknown quantity when he came here. He and McDaniels aren't exactly strangers - you'd think that McD would know that he was a headcase, if in fact he is one.
  16. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Revis Island is here PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    17,067
    Likes Received:
    92
    Ratings:
    +215 / 3 / -1

    #95 Jersey

    i want him back..where are you going to find that production for that cheap? Won't find it this FA for that $$...sucks
  17. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    I don't know how easy it will be for him to get another job. He might be willing to renegotiate eliminating the 3 mil. bonus. This would eliminate any
    risk for the pPatriots.
  18. DocHoliday

    DocHoliday Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Lloyd already signed below market, and after his performance this year someone will pay if the Pats won't.
  19. Get it shawtaay

    Get it shawtaay Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #32 Jersey

    The whole point is that his issues must be pretty f-ing bad if they'd drive the team to make a decision that isn't football smart on the surface... I'll say let him go.
  20. Patsrock

    Patsrock Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 0 / -0

    Do we have any idea when the option bonus is due? Because don't forget this year the NFL added a 3 day period before official start of FA at4pm on March 12. That teams can negotiate with free agents just can't sign until 4pm on the 12th.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>