Soul_Survivor88
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,131
- Reaction score
- 12,056
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I tried to tell you guys this was a bad signing the minute it happened. He's a useless waste of money.Mcclellin has been a disappointment and a no-show so far through 4 games...I wish we used his money to sign Matt Forte instead
Mcclellin has been a disappointment and a no-show so far through 4 games...I wish we used his money to sign Matt Forte instead
If they could sign Forte for that money they probably would. 3.5M against 9M guaranteed.
It is sort of ironic that the two LBs with new contracts look farthest from the field at the moment.
But let's give McClellin a chance to get fully healthy and shows what he can do here before dismissals. He was solid when he was called on the field without being 100%. Of course with the emergence of Roberts and LB usage of Ninkovich the job is not waiting for him ..
I agree. I think I responded something similar to you yesterday in the game thread. To say I have been unimpressed with McClellin would be an understatement. He has done zero but get injured twice. If he's good enough just to spell some guys, then fine. But the contract he received is worth a bit more than giving guys the occasional breather.In hindsight it's looking like a bad deal, but I'm still hesitant to write him off entirely. I will say that I like Roberts a lot more than him so far, although apart from both nominally being LBs their abilities and ideal roles appear to be very different.
I agree. I think I responded something similar to you yesterday in the game thread. To say I have been unimpressed with McClellin would be an understatement. He has done zero but get injured twice. If he's good enough just to spell some guys, then fine. But the contract he received is worth a bit more than giving guys the occasional breather.
Roberts was a revelation yesterday . . . at least to me. He was all over the place. If there wasn't a big #52 on his jersey, I would have thought I was watching High out there. Can he repeat this? We'll have to wait and see. But if he can, we may see something close to what we thought High-Mayo-Collins was going to be.
That's very fair and a good insight. I don't know how well he covers in the passing game, but maybe they envision a role similar to what Tank Williams would have played. I think it also gives them a chance to keep some of the wear-and-tear down on someone like Chung, considering they were using him a lot in the box last season and he seemed to sort of wear down a bit down the stretch (though he still played well).I think the question with Roberts going forward is going to mostly relate to his size. In terms of size, he's closer to Chung than Hightower, and while that wasn't exposed yesterday, there's still a good chance that it will be going forward if/when teams feel the need to start gameplanning for him specifically. Not to diminish him prematurely, just something to watch out for. Even if his ceiling ends up being that he's too small to be an every-down LB but can excel in Rodney Harrison's old big nickel role, that's still a lot of potential production for a 6th round rookie. Getting that kind of production from last-day picks is what keeps teams like the Pats on top.
I feel we have pretty adequate depth at LB. What we lack at the moment, is depth at running back position
I tried to tell you guys this was a bad signing the minute it happened. He's a useless waste of money.
The thread we had when McClellin was signed still holds up.
I shouldn't be surprised given that we've done the same thing to others, from Edelman and Amendola, to Matt Light and Patrick Chung.