Welcome to PatsFans.com

Seven sins

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by ClosingTime, Oct 6, 2006.

  1. ClosingTime

    ClosingTime Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Didn't see this posted....


    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=cr-sinners100406&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
  2. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    "And you can bet his loss will loom large when key plays are needed for a Super Bowl run, too."

    Just reading that arrogant statement, I am reminded of the blessing's of God's love and his forgiveness of sin. Alleluia.
  3. Brownfan80

    Brownfan80 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,305
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0


    Just what we need, more posthumous posturing about the Branch saga. It's a dead issue.

    For all the junk in the papers about the Patriots 'lowballing' they offered just about the same money that Branch ended up taking from Seattle.

    There was a personal vendetta against the ORG by Branch that has been well documented. The only reason he didn't take this supposed 'low ball' offer is because the Patriots wouldn't grant him an out from his current contract, they had written it as an extension to the existing deal without throwing out his final year of his rookie contract. This was a STARTING POINT THAT BRANCH NEVER COUNTERED.

    The simple fact is that the Patriots, in order to keep Branch, would have had to not only over pay for the player, but would have also had to allow a player under a 5 year contract to renig on his deal after 4 years. This double whammy is a comprimise that the Patriots should not have given into, and they did not. Short term it will look like a debacle, longterm this was the absolute best possible outcome that the Patriots could have come to.

    They couldn't have gotten Deion back regardless, because of his Vendetta over the 5th year. So instead of letting him go out empty handed, they got a first round pick for him, only trading him when they got exactly what they deemed was value enough to unload him.

    This over spun story of our cap room and the apparent mis-management by the Patriots brass is silly and overblown.

    I can't say that I'm surprised by how bad the article is though, after all it is from Yahoo sports.
  4. desi-patsfan

    desi-patsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,163
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    my god DB was NOT jerry rice. He was NOT cris carter. He was a good player that will be replaced soon.
  5. tailgater

    tailgater Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Gotta wonder why all the 'experts' aren't working for NFL teams sometimes. There it is, laid out in black and white. How could the Pats screw up so badly?!

    Let this writer join Felger and others that seem to think that, since the cap space is available, feel free to overspend! Where's the harm?

    Are they truly that stupid? For some reason they can foresee the potential problems caused by the Pats actions (guys leaving without even bothering to entertain offers from the Pats, free agents avoiding Foxboro, etc, all certainly possible, certainly with a certain type of player or agent), but fail to do the same from the other side, and completely disregard the ramifications down the road if they had capitulated to Branch and his agent. What player in their right mind would accept anything but a premium to re-sign with the Pats, knowing they'd beat any offer, whether or not the player was top 10 or top 20 at their position or not?
  6. Pats_AZ

    Pats_AZ Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    AMEN!!!

    Well said Box_O_Rocks.....well said.

    Jay
  7. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    13,261
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    ...and that's why Charles Robinson has always been worthless to me.
  8. Bella*chick

    Bella*chick Addicted to the light

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    8,109
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Probably because it's an old issue that no one here cares about anymore.
  9. ClosingTime

    ClosingTime Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Well Excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse Me
  10. Brownfan80

    Brownfan80 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,305
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0


    Just imagine the reception you'd have gotten with this post if we'd LOST to the Bengals. :D
  11. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    Show some charity, it's not like his club has anyone better then Charlie Batch. :cool:
  12. ilduce06410

    ilduce06410 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    are those seven sins deadly?

    IMHO twig wnted to make the big score, get as much money as he possibly could, not leave a penny on the table. thst's his right, but it was obvious from day one, heck, of his rookie contract, that there was no intent to pay him market price, ever. as i recall he signed for lless that his 'slot' usually got.
    One could also argue that neither Brady nor Seymour re-signed at market price, but rather accepted the MINIMUM amount that was appropriate for their status. the same is ctrue for bruschi. IMHO the only players being paid market rate are light and colvin.
    BB/SP wanted the same from the twig.
    instead of simply doing what they could, in the player's best interest, twig's agents screwed up the whole situation. THEY caused the bad blood. so DB signs with seattle for a deal that's only about $2m more than what patriots offered.
  13. ClosingTime

    ClosingTime Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Got get your shinebox.
  14. Oswlek

    Oswlek Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    Charles Robinson makes John Clayton seem manly.

    I can honestly say that I have never seen Robinson write anything that wasn't either horribly misguided or nothing more than a rehash of what every other writer has been saying for weeks.

    He is abso-smurfly the most useless football writer on the planet. And I am not using hyperbole.
  15. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,095
    Likes Received:
    142
    Ratings:
    +228 / 18 / -37

    #50 Jersey

    Unfortunately, this article is pretty worthless since it totally ignores the fact that Branch was offered 2 different contracts and never bothered to send in a counter. All Branch did was give the Patriots an ultimatum. Guarantee that they wouldn't Franchise him or he'd hold out. Its hilarious that they tried to spin it so that all the blame falls on the Patriots and NONE of it on Branch.

    The Patriots attempted to negoiate in good faith with Branch. Branch didn't feel the need to negotiate at all.
  16. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,095
    Likes Received:
    142
    Ratings:
    +228 / 18 / -37

    #50 Jersey

    There is no excuse for you.

    All you did was attempt to troll by posting a clearly BS article.
  17. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,095
    Likes Received:
    142
    Ratings:
    +228 / 18 / -37

    #50 Jersey

    Re: are those seven sins deadly?

    Sorry, IlDuce, but you've got some things wrong. 1) Branch signed for what his slot was supposed to be. 2) Seymour signed for the market value at the time he was negotiating his contract. 3) The Patriots were treating Branch the exact same way they were treating Seymour and Brady in that they were requiring him to finish his rookie contract. If you review Miguel's site, you will see that both Seymour and Brady were paid according to the last year of their rookie deals. Yes, they received the signing bonus of their new deal, but they still were under the salary of their old deals.

    Your use of Bruschi to try and prove your point is pretty ludicrous. The fact is that Bruschi went into management and told them he only wanted the 2 million a year. How can you fault management for that?
  18. ClosingTime

    ClosingTime Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Not really. Robinson was much more critical of the Steelers than he was of the Pats. I thought he entire article was a bit silly but, hey, it's Friday and I thought Rodney could use it in his weekly disrepect diatribe.
  19. 5 Rings for Brady!!

    5 Rings for Brady!! Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    So we have a wiseass troll that wants to try to stir up trouble with some stupid article about some guy that plays for the Seahawks. Then when he is called on it, he does a lame Steve Martin imitation.

    Why don't you go back to your sh#tsburg site and whine about your own team.
  20. Fogbuster

    Fogbuster Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    :trolls:


    And people once called *me* a troll!!

    These media people (those at yahoo or where ever) have _WAY_ freaking too much time on their hands to writing sludge like this. How about the "sin" of greed on Branch's part?? But, no, it's always the "heartless team owners" who are the problem, never players (emboldened by their vampire agents) who are the problem.

    Get a life, media people! You run your team the way you want, and the Patriots will run their team their way. We'll see who's standing in the end.

    :wha:

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>