billdog3484 said:
(1) If you read my posts instead of the quotes people have on me you would hear that i said i dont know of any setbcks. all i posted was what i heard and speculated on that.
Well, the person I took your post from quoted you entirely. So I did read your post. Then, I quoted your post. Maybe you should stop lying and deluding yourself about what other people do and don't do.
billdog3484 said:
(2) im pretty certain that i have had double, if not triple the athletic experience, ability and knowledge than you ever had. I have suffered major injuries, none to my ACL. HOWEVER, having played on a college football team for 4 years, I know quite a few people who have had ACL injuries. I do know of one experience where one of my good friends was rehabbing, and doing light hang cleans, which im sure you dont even know what are, the presssure caused a major setback.
Whiny people yourself always claim they have more of everything than someone else. Well, I hate to break this to you, but you've not shown one IOTA of athletic knowledge or experience based on your posts. As for your dumb claim, considering you don't know me from a hole in the wall, its truly pathetic and really something that only an internet toughguy would say. Now, what you HAVE shown is complete BS exaggeration and unfounded speculation. So, please continue with your stupid, ignorant posts. Show everyone how "smart" you are by posting BS rumors that can't even be substantiated by NUMEROUS other sources. Sources such as ESPN, JetsInsiders, TheGangGreen, etc, who would be ALL OVER any rumor about Brady.
As for Light Hang Cleans, why would Brady be doing those? Answer. He wouldn't. They aren't needed for his athletic skill set as a QB. Not to mention that any IDIOT knows that you shouldn't be doing hang cleans of ANY type until your knee was 100%. As you said, the pressure can cause a major set back. Typically, in ACL therapy, they'd have you doing inclined squats on a squat bench or Nautilus at low weight and high reps to start with. The reason being is that the bench or Nautilus have hand stops that you can grab and pull in the even you feel your legs giving out. After you show good form on the lower weights, they work you up from there as long as there wasn't any inflammation.
billdog3484 said:
now, im not saying Brady suffered a major setback, but that Francessa reported that. To get on my post reporting this news, shows you are some sort of nitwit with nothing better to do. you dont even read my posts and comment on pieces of quotes people copy and paste then subsequently comment on. how do you have any idea of what i am saying? then you go and comment on it?????? i will gladly have a conversation, a friendly one. but time after time you have proven to be incapable of such a thing. you wrote me a private email telling me that i am a loser. how so? because i disagree with you and stood up to the fact that you continuously call people idiots? you didnt respond. to me, if i write something to someone, i will read what they wrote, and respond. you did not. so, this just shows me you are incapable of sitting down and having a conversation with someone who disagrees with you because there is not enough intellectual background to have a constructive argumentative conversation . but of course you will never see this post so, if someone wants, cut and paste it for him
1) What you said was that Francesca reported that Brady had a setback. You didn't say anything about it being major or minor. In fact, here is your quote.
billdog3484 said:
Mike Francessa reported on 660 WFAN New York today at around 1:05pm that he was told Brady suffered another setback earlier this week. He said that doctors are the ones who told him this. I have been trying to find other sources to confirm this, but have not found any. He did not say what type of setback, or how severe a setback he suffered if he did in fact re-injure himself.
It is clear to me now, that there is no way we are letting Cassel walk. I said it a few weeks ago and got ripped apart, but if this is true, it is obvious Cassel will be on our roster.
2) You made a pathetic attempt to use Francesca's report as an "SEE, I'm RIGHT" to show up the people who ripped you apart weeks ago. Unfortunately for you, people saw what it was because you made it plainly obvious. Had you just said.. "Could this mean that the Patriots aren't going to let Cassel walk?" then you could have been justified. But you didn't and aren't.
3) I don't continuously call people idiots. I only call those who earn the title by that name. You happen to be one of them.
4) You really shouldn't LIE abouts PMs or what people post. Its very easy to prove you wrong. As it happens, I have the PM I sent you (sent on 1-4-2009 at 8:25 AM) and I didn't call you a loser. I called you a hypocrite because of your whining in that one particular thread. And it was for you getting your panties in a wad over my posts about Lifer. Yet, others were doing the same thing and you said nothing. As for the mail you sent me, why would I respond? I've put you on ignore because, typically, you aren't worth talking to. Because of posts like the one you started this thread with. You'll note that its only when people respond to you and start taking you to task that I throw my two cents in as well.
5) I am perfectly capable of sitting down and having conversations with people. I do so all the time. And even with people who disagree with me. You know why? Because they rely on facts to support their argument. They don't offer up half-assed speculation as their support and expect people to take it as fact. They also don't go and over-exaggerate reality in some vain attempt to make some modicum of a point. And, unlike you, they are willing to admit they were wrong.