So, let me get this straight. MItt's always been in favor of the Citizens United ruling, he thinks it's ok for big businesses and large corporations to donate huge sums of money to a political candidate, but it's not ok for a union, specifically a teacher's union, to donate? The reason being that it might influence a politician sitting at a barginning table but a politician passing a tax relief bill, contracting to do government business with or signing a subsidy wouldn't be???? Does he even think before he opens his mouth? Romney: Teacher contributions to politicians should be limited - Political Hotsheet - CBS News He then went on to totally diss a parent - if you get a chance, find the video - he as much as called the parent a liar - even though there is a poll which supports the parent's position and remark. If that wasn't enough, when asked if all children deserved the quality of education he received he replied, ""That's not going to be available for the entire nation." Certainly not if he's president, that's for sure.