nashvillepatsfan
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 3,062
- Reaction score
- 2
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I really wish we could go deep inside the head of Belichick to wonder why he did not hold onto Kevin a week longer and get a little compensation for Kevin,but I think we gave up long ago trying to figure out how Belichick thinks up deep in his cranium.
Rex Ryan makes Eric Mangini seem like a cool dude. No?
I think Belichick is pictured as cold and heartless and a business-only type of guy. I don't believe it for a minute. He has friends in the game, including players and coaches on many teams. He does them favors. They do him favors. He also has his enemies (one is NOT Mangini).
I think Vrabel was GIVEN to pioli as a favor to both pioli and vrabel. After all, this was a way to guarantee Vrabel his 2009 salary and his bonus. The alternative was to cut him and get a 5th or 6th the next week.
There have been many players he has cut early so that they would have time to catch on elsewhere. There are others who he cuts at the very last chance he has.
My guess with regard to O'Connell is that he pi$$ed off the coach with his performance or attitude that Belichick simply had someone get rid of him immediately. This is just like the old days where a kicker or player was cut after the game after screwing up. When that happens, folks pay attention.
The BOTTOM LINE is that Belichick uses and trades draft choices as well as any one in the league. But I don't think that he always tries to optimize and get the best deal.
And yes, I can imagine a comment made Seymour resulting in a call to Al asking if he still was interested in Seymour.
Stop, please , stop.
-- FRITZ
But O'Connell clearly isn't worth that or our top-notch, best-in-the-league, front office would have gotten at least the same as compensation instead of cutting him.
Well, I know you are being sarcastic, butI believe that our front officce IS the best in the league.But O'Connell clearly isn't worth that or our top-notch, best-in-the-league, front office would have gotten at least the same as compensation instead of cutting him.
Oh no, KOC will tell them what Tom really means when he yells OMAHA
That's why the '03 playbook that was circulated online was great for explaining the complexities of the playbook....
I wonder if they dumped him so early because they thought of the possibility of him being picked up by the Bills/Jets or some early season opponent and get pumped for info, so they cut him before installing the game plan????
Well, I know you are being sarcastic, butI believe that our front officce IS the best in the league.
However, the use of "clearly" is not indicated here.
THink:
a) The Jets offered teh Pats a 6th and BB declined to send KOC to the hated Jets
b) (more likely) the act of cutting a player sends a different message to a team than trading. It leads me to believe that KOC had coaching/attitude issues a la CHad Jackson, Doug Gabriel, etc
All are possibilities. But from the events, you can't say, "Clearly this must have been the case."
They can't... It's clear to them (because he's not doing what they recommend) that BB has lost his fastball and he's getting lazy and arrogant and if they don't continue to point that out he'll get away with it...
Or front office is the best in the league. We use draft choices better than anyone. However, Belichick in this instant (and many others) does not not try to get the max out of trades.
But O'Connell clearly isn't worth that or our top-notch, best-in-the-league, front office would have gotten at least the same as compensation instead of cutting him.
I agree. Also, still scratching my head about the Casssel/Vrabel for a KC 2nd rounder. That one seemed egregious.
Belichick has said multiple times, that KC was the only team with an offer on the table that was willing to sign RIGHT NOW. They needed the cap space to talk to Springs and Bodden, as well as tender some of their RFAs.
Posters can post forever that Cassel was worth a 1st and a 3rd and that Vrabel was worth a third. It seems that no GM agreed with them, and the patriots weren't willing to tube their entire offseason to find out if they could get a better draft choice later.
I think, had Brady got hurt in 2007, and Cassel taken them to 11-5, they get a 1st and 3rd for Cassel, with his $800K salary. But thats not what happened.
They needed to move him, and quick.
I absolutely agree with regard to Cassel. We probably would have taken a 4th or 5th. We needed the cap room and no one but kc would deal for Cassel and his $14M salary in the hope that they could sign a long-tern deal. Belichick was willing to include Vrabel who he didn't think ws worth his bonus and salary, and the deal was done before the March 1st deadline.
Posters can post forever that Cassel was worth a 1st and a 3rd and that Vrabel was worth a third. It seems that no GM agreed with them, and the patriots weren't willing to tube their entire offseason to find out if they could get a better draft choice later.