Welcome to PatsFans.com

Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by NG Pats Fan, Oct 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BradyBranch39

    BradyBranch39 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,344
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    You can't judge the trade based on the stupid contract they gave him way after the trade.
  2. WhiZa

    WhiZa Rookie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    5,043
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Not having Solder now would be worse than what we would have gained from any of those players.
  3. Patsrock

    Patsrock Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 0 / -0

    Well he was on the 2007 teams FYI
  4. patsfaninpa

    patsfaninpa Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,640
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +30 / 8 / -1


    Laughable. JJ Watt and Von Miller might have helped us win it all last year. Matt Light gets more money thrown his way and returns. We could have gotten our T this spring.
  5. ThatllMoveTheChains!!!

    ThatllMoveTheChains!!! Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Matt Light reveals decade-long battle with Crohn's - ESPN Boston I highly doubt they could've gotten Light to come back for reasonable money if at all.
  6. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,347
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +46 / 1 / -4

    Can't change history but JJ Watt is the best defensive end in football right now. I think he would have made a big impact on our defense and he could have possibly made an impact on us winning it all in 2011. I mean if Watt batts down a Manning pass or forces him to get rid of the ball a split second too early in that game could have easily spelled the difference in the match.

    I don't regret ending up with Solder but I feel that Watt is far and away more of an impact playmaker if we are going to revise history.
  7. PatsDeb

    PatsDeb PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,000
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +40 / 0 / -1

    AGreed. From what I have seen of Oakland it's their atrocious offense that has been the problem, not Seymour or their defense.
  8. BSR

    BSR Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    With Scar doing his thing, I think we could have found a viable replacement if it meant picking up one of those guys. You can't coach the level of talent in those defensive players.
  9. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,487
    Likes Received:
    52
    Ratings:
    +158 / 4 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    I hated the trade at the time, because I thought that, with Seymour, we could have won another title in '09 (and/or in '10 if we'd found a way to tag/keep Seymour). People seem to have already forgotten how good he was, but he was pretty much impossible to run on and also generated a credible pass rush at the same time. Once-in-a-generation type talent at his best, and he was still pretty close to his prime.

    Over time, I've softened my stance. I still think that there's a >25% chance that this trade cost the Pats a fourth Lombardi, especially when the Ravens knocked us out at home in '09 by attacking where Seymour should have been (and remember, this was a year that a fairly unimposing Jets team went to the AFCCG). That said, if the economic reality was that it was literally impossible to keep both Seymour and Wilfork, then letting Seymour go was the right call. Wilfork's brought his game to a whole new level over the last couple of seasons, and Seymour isn't quite so valuable in the defense that the Pats run these days.

    On the Oakland side, I don't see what they're complaining about. Seymour has been a leader and an impact player for them, and they would have whiffed on the pick anyway.
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  10. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,487
    Likes Received:
    52
    Ratings:
    +158 / 4 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    You'd rather have Solder than JJ Watt? Seriously?
  11. PatsFan2

    PatsFan2 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    2,542
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    Say Watt???:confused:;)
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  12. Bhelmet

    Bhelmet Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1 / -0

    Of course they are upset, what do the Raiders' fans have to be happy about anyway?
  13. patfanken

    patfanken On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,706
    Likes Received:
    248
    Ratings:
    +430 / 13 / -8

    #91 Jersey

    Why are you guys even talking as if JJ Watt was an option. He was NOT! Watt was picked 6 full picks before we had a chance to choose.

    Listen, Richard Seymour was a great player for the Pats for several years. But the lessons of overpaying aging vets is just too clear. Its hard enough to make that kind of commitment jump in their 2nd contracts let alone their 3rd. And while he has been a good player for the Raiders, between injury and age, he has never risen to the elite level he was in his prime, and certainly has NOT been a good value for Raiders

    I would guarantee you that neither the Raiders, Seehawks, OR Eagles would over pay for the likes of Seymour, Branch, or Samuel if they had a do over. In fact how happy can the Eagles be with their latest CB mega-investment. Some teams never learn. The times when that kind of investment works out are very rare indeed.
  14. BSR

    BSR Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    We aren't talking about him as if he was an option. I was talking about how the trade would have been viewed if Oakland was supposed to suck the year before the draft as they were supposed to so we would have had a top ten pick. You're losing it old man. :D
  15. condon84

    condon84 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    19
    Ratings:
    +51 / 5 / -2

    We're playing the "What-if" game so every transaction the team did that led to Seymour getting traded should be up for debate. Signing Adalius to that big contract certainly didn't help.

    In regards to the idea that the Pats could only keep Wilfork or Seymour, who said this? It's a ridiculous idea. Unless you can find a quote directly from Bill, I call BS. We just signed both Gronk and Ahern who play the same position to big contracts. Wilfork and Seymour are arguably better players and more valuable to the team. Our defense hasn't been the same since Seymour left. Meanwhile, it seems like Brady can get any Tom, Dick, and Harry to look great.

    It was a stupid trade then and probably cost us some important wins.
  16. jnug

    jnug Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I do remember the scuttlebutt around the Pats at the time was that Seymour was going to make a more vocal play for a big contract than BB likes seeing.

    I don't wonder if Seymour's next Pats contract was coming along right at a time when the prototypical DE-DT started coming into the league carrying a bit more weight over a 6'6" frame than Seymour carries while still being very athletic. I think this is particularly true for DT. I don't mean to imply that Seymour fell off a cliff after leaving the Pats, far from it. However I don't wonder if that had an impact on the Pats willingness to accommodate a guy that looked like he was really going to make a play for the big money...something the Pats are pretty stingy about in the first place. BB loves to cut these things off at the pass and it might have been as much that as anything else. Plus as others have already pointed out if Oakland had just played to form that year, we would have been picking higher in that draft. Stupid Raiders...can't do anything right.
  17. RI Patriots fan

    RI Patriots fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,764
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ratings:
    +141 / 7 / -19



    The year before he arrived in Oakland, the Raiders went 5-11. His first year with the Raiders they improved to....5-11.
    He has been with them for 4 seasons with this being his 5th and they haven't had one winning season...not one.

    The year he arrived in Oakland, the Raiders had the 27th ranked defense. His first year with thr Raiders they improved to.....26th....wow.
    Last year, Oakland's defense was ranked 29th. This year they're all the way up to 25th.

    After this year, Seymour will be gone from the Raiders and we will have our starting Left tackle for the next 10 years.

    Slam dunk.
  18. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,487
    Likes Received:
    52
    Ratings:
    +158 / 4 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Now look at all of the defensive players that they've lost in the interim.
  19. Walpole Pats Fan

    Walpole Pats Fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #54 Jersey

    Haven't read the whole thread, but guys like Vince Wilfork don't grow on trees either.
  20. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,664
    Likes Received:
    67
    Ratings:
    +131 / 7 / -13


    A franchise LT is worth more than any of these guys even Watt, especially what e now know about Matt Light's Crone's disease issue.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>