broadwayjoe
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2004
- Messages
- 2,314
- Reaction score
- 1
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/news/story?id=2321024
If this is true all I can say is WOW.
If this is true all I can say is WOW.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.broadwayjoe said:http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/news/story?id=2321024
If this is true all I can say is WOW.
mtbykr said:I always had a great respect for joe cool! However if this is true, it's really sad--i mean a $100k to walk out onto the field (and possibly flip the coin) is just stupid. Joe must really be hurting for money!
sdaniels7114 said:Its an event the NFL gets a lot of money from. I don't see why ex-players are bad for being unwilling to donate their image to a profitable venture. If you choose to appear for $1000 even though you're worth more that's your business; but I can't blame someone for wanting the going rate when the NFL's making a bundle.
maverick4 said:I read that Joe didn't want to miss his son's basketball game.
It's possible he'd rather be with his family than miss his son's game just to be recognized for 20 seconds on TV.
He probably threw out a really high asking price because he didn't want to do it.
.
shmessy said:Evidently you don't understand some basics.
Montana and Bradshaw made their fortunes off of that "profitable venture". They didn't make it externally. You would have had a valid point if you were defending someone like the Rolling Stones who don't owe their financial lives to the brilliance of the NFL marketing offices.
If Bradshaw and Montana played brilliantly for some Lacrosse league, they would never be living off the gravy like they are now.
They owe a helluva lot to the NFL and they showed their true colors.
Bill's Girl said:It's too bad. It would have been cool to see Tommy with his idol, Montana.
workhorse said:Montana is the one that wanted the $100k. BTW, when Bradshaw played players weren't making the coin they are now. He has probably made a lot more from FOX after football.
mgteich said:As I understand, Montana has a marketing contract with set prices for appearances. Bradshaw likely does also.
Are you guys really saying that the NFL has the right to have any of its ex-players appear anytime that they want without compensation?
What these guys do for a living now is to appear in public.
-------------------
In any case, if Montana has a beef with the league, should he be forced to come. Why? Because the NFL decided that they want the past 39 MVP's? Will they want all the winning QB's next year, and the winning kicker the next?
REPEAT AFTER ME
This is a business. The current owners of the NFL are making plenty of money. The players are making plenty of money.
If y'all want to get on your high horses, how about getting the owners to spend more on the retired players.
workhorse said:Bradshaw wanted to be with his family....
"Bradshaw, who told league officials that he wanted to be with his family, also took issue with the fees, the Chronicle reported. Bradshaw, through a representative, denied the Chronicle's report that there was a dispute over money."
Montana is the one that wanted the $100k. BTW, when Bradshaw played players weren't making the coin they are now. He has probably made a lot more from FOX after football.
Joe Montana Needs The Cash Money
Last week, we told you about how sad we were [link = http://www.deadspin.com/sports/nfl/montana-honors-his-corporate-obligations-152306.php] for Joe Montana that he was seemingly willing to hawk any product that would pay him. But now we don’t think it’s a dignity thing; we’re now geniunely concerned if Montana is having money problems.
As most of you have probably seen already, Montana reportedly turned down the opportunity to be with other Super Bowl MVPs last night because the league wouldn’t meet his $100,000 asking price for an appearance fee. Terry Bradshaw also didn’t show up, though we have a feeling that had something to do with Kathy Bates.
We’re not sure what’s going on with Montana, but clearly something’s up. For years, we thought Montana’s hesitance to join the TV gaggle of talking heads was something admirable, maybe a rare desire for a human being to spend at least a wee bit of time out of the public eye. But now we’re thinking that maybe he just didn’t want to get paid for actually doing work; he wanted to get paid simply to appear. And now that he’s back around so much, we’re wondering if anyone will pay him to disappear, again.
[http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2006/02/06/SPG9QH3GD91.DTL]
it took me a minute.JoeSixPat said:Any chance Montana was sitting behind the goalpost when Flutie did his drop kick?