Again, in the context of the NFL rulebook, the word REVIEW has a very specific meaning. The fact that you say they "reviewed" the play doesn't mean there was a "REVIEW".
so based on your logic, lets look at the following scenario and give me your opinion . . .
lets say the refs make a "wrong call" and do it on a "non reviewable" call, the coach for the team that was hurt by the call has the following conversation with the ref regarding challenging the play"
Coach: "Hey ref I want to challenge the play, you made a wrong call."
Ref: "Sorry coach we can't review that call is non-reviewable and it has to stay as called on the field . . . "
coach: "darn, i thought we could get it right . . . :-("
Ref "Sorry coach those are the rules . . ."
Coach: "hey wait a minute i just got an idea . . . "
Ref: "yah coach . . ."
Coach: "take a look at the jumbotron, see where you made a mistake . . .?"
Ref: "hey your right coach, we did make a mistake, I am going to reverese the call on the field . . "
The ref then goes to the middle of the field and announces that he is going to reverse the call on the field
What is your opinion on the matter?
Does not that action usurp and render meaningless the replay policy?
Why do coaches need challenges if all they have to do is ask the ref to look at the jumbotron to get the call correct?