- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 11,508
- Reaction score
- 9,979
True that. His opinions tend to be off mark.
Anyone remember his Jabaal Sheard love?:bricks:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.True that. His opinions tend to be off mark.
I respect your opinion, Cstjohn. However, I feel it's just too early to tell, especially when the kid showed some great flashes last season. I know that everyone has moments, but he had many last season. There were many times that he was within inches of a sack before the QB got rid of the ball.
I see something. I can't say if it's good or great, but I do see something there. I watched him play in person many times at UF, and he just never gives up on the play. He has the Clay Matthews motor. We'll just have to wait and see.
No problemo, we are all hoping for the best. I just think the expectations don't match a realistic career path of the guy. IMO he becomes a solid 3 down player, sets the edge, gets a few pressures and contributes on special teams.
Hopefully he gets a few sacks every down and then and helps the 3rd down defense.
The guy was mentioend as the next big time pass rusher but in reality he is likely to be just a pretty good player not dynamic in any special way. McGinest was a top 5 pick, Vrabel was the all time sack leader at Ohio State, Colvin was a prized free agent.
Cunningham was a 2nd round pick without much of a pass rushing resume. IMO he will evolve into a dependable starter but nothing special.
One week of practice, probably getting shut down by Vollmer, and we're sweating the kid?? Really? As long as he doesnt get hurt in practice, I dont think we need to be concerned. Soon enough, we'll all get to see w/ our own eyes in an actual game what he looks like.
I don't remember anyone calling Cunningham the "next big time pass rusher". On the contrary, many people pointed out that they believed that it was because of him that Dunlap was able to have such a good senior year.
Cunningham came out as a more well rounded LBer who could also rush the passer. He also had the same number of Sacks as Dunlap. 19.5. That shouldn't be over-looked.
I find it funny that people are getting all disappointed over Reiss' statement, but are disregarding that there had been several GOOD reports about Cunningham, up to this point.
Only a homer would believe he was impressive last season. I don't think he's a bust already, because he was a late second rounder--you shouldn't expect so much out of him. He did what is to be expected of a late second round pick changing from a DE to an OLB, but it was by no means impressive. He can impress later in his career, but he hasn't done anything to warrant a not-so-great sophomore season as a slump.
As a first-year OLB in a notoriously difficult system? Yeah, he was impressive. Once he builds on his upper body strength, you can project him to be an 8+ sack/season type of guy.
You can call me a homer to your heart's content for holding that opinion, but rest assured I find your position similarly nonsensical.
I love Mike Reiss when he focuses on reporting the facts. When it comes to actually offering his opinion, he tends to been more miss than hit. This is plainly evident in his draft reviews...
I am genuinely asking that you point me to what you've read that was good (no flaming). The reason I ask is because I've read many articles to the contrary. I have seen many people in addition to Reiss who have mentioned that the kid has struggled.
Not sure if you can read it...
NFL Draft Scout----Powered By: The Sports Xchange
Under the News Section.
Also, if you read through Bedard's "Love me some One on Ones" you'll see that Cunningham started off well (through Practice #8 anyways) but hasn't done much the last few days..
Let's expand on that. If he's playing the Strong Side DE position, then he's going up against Vollmer AND/OR Gronkowski.. Vollmer was a 2nd team All-Pro and Gronkowski is one in the making..
Vince Wilfork had a second year slump too.
Yeah, you know with some people, he's either gonna be the next Lawrence Taylor or he'll be a failure. And it goes without saying, that he'll be, without question, the most scrutinized young player on the team right now. All eyes are literally on him. He's expected to be the pass-rushing savior. So, if after a week he isnt looking like the second coming, its "concern, concern". Like I said, the kid is healthy right now, practicing right now, learning, and improving, regardless of however much he may actually be "struggling". People need to relax and allow young players to develop. And has been said, listen to Reiss when he writes a nice article or reports news, but when he wants to offer analysis, realize that's NOT the man's strong suit.
Cunningham had one sack last season. If he " goes into a slump " this year what does that mean? Negative sacks ?
Yeah, you know with some people, he's either gonna be the next Lawrence Taylor or he'll be a failure. And it goes without saying, that he'll be, without question, the most scrutinized young player on the team right now. All eyes are literally on him. He's expected to be the pass-rushing savior. So, if after a week he isnt looking like the second coming, its "concern, concern". Like I said, the kid is healthy right now, practicing right now, learning, and improving, regardless of however much he may actually be "struggling". People need to relax and allow young players to develop. And has been said, listen to Reiss when he writes a nice article or reports news, but when he wants to offer analysis, realize that's NOT the man's strong suit.
As a first-year OLB in a notoriously difficult system? Yeah, he was impressive. Once he builds on his upper body strength, you can project him to be an 8+ sack/season type of guy.
You can call me a homer to your heart's content for holding that opinion, but rest assured I find your position similarly nonsensical.
I don't take anything into account except for performance when I decide if something is impressive or not. Cunningham was an average starter last year. That's impressive when you consider the situation he was thrown into, but if you ignore the conditions, he was still just average.
EDIT: But I do agree that he has the potential to be an 8+ sack guy.