Nope not currently practicing (I practiced securities and corporate law in NYC for a while). Don't want to go back to law school either! Also have no real desire to take another bar.... once was enough.
And BB says in EVERY single press conference he has ever had that there are thing they need to work on and do better. I would certainly fall over backwards and I'm sure you would too if he stepped up to the podium and said "We are football perfection. Nothing more to work on here." So I don't read very much into it...my guess is they will always work to improve, even if they win 55-0. Besides, what BB says or doesn't say in his press conferences was not remotely a part of your original bargain (ie. I reserve the right to comment on facets of the game that BB mentions in his press conferences, etc.), so I'm not sure how it's relevant to the original deal.
The point is when you say I promise to do so and so PROVIDED THAT they run things in a way I find satisfactory, and then don't provide a framework for exactly what that is (ie. how many play action passes...in what circumstances, etc.) you are not really agreeing to do anything at all. If you meant to critique the performance regardless of whether or not it was offensive perfection for all 60 minutes (and if you meant to critique them on a quarter by quarter basis, you should have explicitly stated it), then why even propose a deal at all. Because I have never, ever seen a game in which the Pats were perfect in every way, offensively or defensively all four quarters.