Art Monk played before my time, but is there a general consensus amongst the posters on this board that he is absolutely Hall worthy? I have no other resources at my hands other than statistics, which is a very poor method (if taken by itself) to diagnose how great someone was. He had few singularly great seasons, and failed to rank in the top ten more than four times in receptions, more than three times in yards, once in TDs, and for his career he is 7th in receptions and 12th in yards before falling completely off the charts in the other major receiving categories. Was he great or is this a case of the media lamenting over a player justly being left out?
SITE MENU