emoney_33
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Messages
- 5,218
- Reaction score
- 42
I think Hobbs is a solid #2 corner. He's good in coverage and thats the most important thing. He has some lapses, but what corner doesn't ?
If I have a been with him its that he could be better against the run. But the Hobbs bashers should realize there are plenty of plays where the coverage is tight on his side of the field. Do you think all of our sacks are due to pash rush? I would say a good percentage of them are coverage sacks, and I don't see Hobbs getting a lot of help in coverage, none more than anyone else would on this defense.
Exactly. You don't see the plays where Hobbs has good coverage, or the sacks that are created by good coverage all around. Hobbs isn't perfect, every DB gets beat from time to time. I don't think he's been beaten frequently at all. Also playing so far off the line has to be scheme. He doesn't have the instincts of Samuel but he does have good coverage more often than not. He also plays the ball well MOST of the time when it is in the air.