- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 15,208
- Reaction score
- 12,977
Last time I looked Logan Mankins was drafted at a high pick in round 2.
Might be time to look again, then. Mankins was picked #32, round 1.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Last time I looked Logan Mankins was drafted at a high pick in round 2.
Even better. That makes 2 ones and 2 twos amongst our best four. Martin and/or Bitonio. Add talent and youth. Right now our interior line is 32 years Connolly, 32 Mankins, and 28-29 for Wendell, Its time for some youth.Might be time to look again, then. Mankins was picked #32, round 1.
Even better. That makes 2 ones and 2 twos amongst our best four. Martin and/or Bitonio. Add talent and youth. Right now our interior line is 32 years Connolly, 32 Mankins, and 28-29 for Wendell, Its time for some youth.
Last time I looked Logan Mankins was drafted at a high pick in round 2. He is and has been a G since day 1. When Matt Light was drafted everyone thought of him as a G too.
Zack Martin or Joel Bitonio are college left tackles who at 6'4" are a little too small for tackle. BB says he wants flexibility in his players and drafts Left tackles Bitonio is called the best blocking OL in the draft, how good would he be at RG?. It frees Connolly to go back and compete at center. Light ,Solder, Mankins and Vollmer were higher picks and all started Day 1. Plus the OL is getting old; older than the DL. Its a good year for interior O linemen, so take advantage of that. Double dip in the 3rd or 4th with redshirt injury Brandon Thomas. You will have added needed youth and talent and hopefully solved the Offensive line problems. The PS guys on the roster add depth.
A Team with a Good Line always has Offense, regardless of the skill positions. .
I don't like this idea that people say "the Patriots never do this". We had never taken a RB in the 1st round...until it happened, we had never taken a interior lineman in the 1st round...until it happened. We had never taken a defensive end in the 1st round.....until it happened.
With the Patriots, don't rule anything out. They will take whoever they think fits their team the best. If a Mangold type is there, they would take him. If a Larry Fitzgerald type was there, they would take him too. I honestly don't think they limit themselves.
I agree that they will do things we don't expect but the player has to be there and in this draft there is no Nick Mangold so they won't be taking one in the first. A center is a serious consideration after that because there is real talent there in the second and third rounds.
Sorry but what real talent do you Refer to ?
Martin, Richburg, Swanson.....None are first rounders but all 3 are worth a serious look in the 2nd and 3rd rounds if they are available.
Disagree. There are 2-3 other players i'll much rather have. Bitonio i beleave we all would love, but Wesley Johnson BB worked out and John Urschel ( My blinky ) we can get much later in the draft.
No way i would use a first on Bitonio and Johnson at 290 is just too light for the NFL imo. They need an upgrade inside not a project. I would take a true center if Martin or Richburg are there in the 2nd.
John Urschel ( My blinky ) we can get much later in the draft.
I was very interested to read that Urschel worked out exclusively at center at the Penn State pro day. IMO he projects much, much better to C than G.
,
First Johnson is 298 Second Richburg are 297 - Lets get the facts right ok.
I didn't talk about useing a 1. on Bitonio, but he wont go in the top 40, Small trade up could be done.
Martin mayby, but then we talk round 3.
I get what you are saying but It really depends on the player they pick. If they did go WR there is a real chance the player could beat out Dobson, and as much as I like Hightower there also a real chance Shazier could end up outside with Collins with Mayo in the middle. If they play It right and the draft falls right I could see them getting guys who contribute significantly on the interior OL, TE, LB, and possibly on the DL.If we keep our first I think I'm only content if we take a player that can be a day one starter. And looking at our current roster I think OG/C, S and maybe TE are the only positions that can happen at. I like Bitonio and Wesley Johnson a lot for that reason.
At this point i don't want an OL in the first and definitely don't want them using a first on Bitonio. If martin was there it would be a consideration but I would still have a number of guys i would take over him, Shazier, Sefarian-Jenkins, Tuitt etc.... I would, however, put more emphasis on interior OL in the next 2 rounds, especially if they could get a really good starting center like Richburg or Martin.
I think this is kind of an obvious statement, but one of the best ways to address this whole process may be to trade down into the late 30's or so, for more selections in the "meat" of the rounds 2-4.
That could enable Belichick to draft 2 players (or so) in all three rounds 2-4, considering that we have two fourths from the comp pick. Any way you look at it, it would give us a plethora of picks in that all important middle area, where the majority of these players we're debating on seem to lie.
To take it one step further, if we still ended up with a good defensive prospect at #35 or #37 or something, that would just be one enormous bonus. Then we could have a guy like Tuitt, Richburg, Niklas, Robinson, Hyde etc all in that 35-80 area, with multiple selections. Again, it's the obvious way to go, and has been brought up before. That's pretty much what I'm hoping can happen.
If not, it's Shazier or Hageman/Tuitt for me at 29---unless someone crazy is still on the board who was ranked in the top 15-20 prospects.