Welcome to PatsFans.com

Rank our offensive line as pass blockers

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by mgteich, Jul 25, 2010.

?

Rank Our OL As Pass-Blockers

  1. 1 - 5 (top 5 in the league)

    13 vote(s)
    38.2%
  2. 6 - 10

    15 vote(s)
    44.1%
  3. 11 - 15

    5 vote(s)
    14.7%
  4. 16 - 20

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. 21 - 25

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. 26 - 32 (bottom 7 in the league)

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    Rank Our Offensive Line As Pass Blockers
  2. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,460
    Likes Received:
    288
    Ratings:
    +746 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    Top 5 when healthy.
  3. Patstopia

    Patstopia Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2006
    Messages:
    687
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    I think the line is better at pass than run. But the only reason they are any good at all is Brady and his quick decision/release. Take him away and they are barely adequate at both. They need help at Center and R Guard. An if Mankins sits....
  4. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    We have one of the top 5 RG's in the league.

    Is Moss only OK beacuse Brady plays on the same team? Of course not! Would Moss have great production at Oakland? Of course not!

    We are judging the PATRIOT offensive line, playing for the patriots, with Brady as quarterback and with the runners we have running tha ball. If we had a Dillon running for us, our OL would be higher ranked as run blockers. HOWEVER, it is what it is. We have an OL. The question is how good they are, given where they play.

    And yes, Deus makes a fine point. We are assuming health.

  5. Calciumee

    Calciumee PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,600
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #3 Jersey

    When they are healthy, top 10, if not top 5.

    When injury strikes; somewhere in the top 32 :)
  6. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    This is the greatest indictment of Connolly that I have yet seen. If you are right, then we VERY, VERY badly need to sign or trade for a backup offensive lineman.

    Last edited: Jul 25, 2010
  7. N.Eman

    N.Eman Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Wish I could rank top 5, but unsure if we make it there since Mankins is holding up. Not to mention plugging his spot with ok backups, and im still not convinced we have the right side stabilized with Kaczur. So that puts us somewhere between 6-10
  8. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    Kaczur is as good a RT as we have had since Belichick arrived, not counting Vollmer, or did you prefer Gorin and Ashworth. Kaczur has been a starter at LT and RT since his rookie year. It is NOT about stabilizing the right side. Kaczur has been there for four years. Belichick and Dante liked him enough to give him a fine extension contract (when many here wanted to cut him). There is little reason to believe that Kaczur is a weakness at RT. A healthy Neal is certainly not a weakness at RG. He is one of the top 5 RG's in the league.

    Last edited: Jul 25, 2010
  9. patriotscpfc

    patriotscpfc Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I'd say it's more saying how good that Stephen Neal is.

    The Line falls apart without Neal.

    Kaczur looks terrible without Neal whereas he looks good when Neal plays.

    I don't think the play of the Line would drop a massive amount if Kaczur took Mankins place
  10. patsfan-1982

    patsfan-1982 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,045
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +7 / 1 / -0

    when brady is the QB they are a top 5 pass blocking team.




    in 2007 pretty much the same line gave up 21 sacks last year again pretty much the same line gave up 18 sacks. but in 2008 with out brady they gave up 48 sacks



    and we all seen with a top pass rushing team can do to this line even with brady at QB thats why i said 11 to 15
  11. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,460
    Likes Received:
    288
    Ratings:
    +746 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    The 2008 sacks thing is an unfair argument, IMO. The season began with Cassel learning on the job and Neal out (with terrible replacements). The numbers improved dramatically over the course of the season, most notably after Neal's return to the starting lineup.
  12. stinkypete

    stinkypete Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,264
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +28 / 0 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    Mankins, Neil and Vollmer are all top 5 players at their positions (counting Vollmer at RT).

    Light, Koppen and Kaczur may have slipped a touch, but they are all in the top half in the league at their respective positions.

    LeVoir and Connly are probably average backups. And there's a decent amount of developmental talent. Let's assume 1 of the group of Orhnburger, Bussey and Welsch becomes a viable backup.

    Overall that is a very good group. Top 5, both in depth and talent (assuming Mankins plays). Without Mankins, probably still a top 10 group.
  13. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    26,509
    Likes Received:
    354
    Ratings:
    +900 / 18 / -24

    No Jersey Selected

    I'm assuming that Kaczur can come in and do a commendable job of replacing Mankins' production and Vollmer can grow at the RT position. With those assumptions in mind, I don't see why our O-Line can't be top five when they are all healthy. The quality of the depth is another argument, though.
  14. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,396
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +215 / 14 / -2

    We will be fine if Kaczur can do "a commendable job of replacing Mankins' production"????????????

    I am certainly a Kaczur fan, but I don't pin my hopes on Kaczur being anything but an average LG. He is not Mankins.

  15. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    26,509
    Likes Received:
    354
    Ratings:
    +900 / 18 / -24

    No Jersey Selected

    I didn't say he had to play on Mankins' level. Nor did I say that he could. Just do a commendable job of replacing him (i.e. - better than Connolly did last year replacing Neal, which was not commendable). Once again, try reading my actual quotes.
  16. Sciz

    Sciz PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,215
    Likes Received:
    87
    Ratings:
    +200 / 2 / -0

    I concur with top-5 when healthy, not top-5 when Neal is out. Mankins signing would be huge, making Kaczur an ideal swing-man at basically any position other than center (but ideally Vollmer to LT and Kaczur to RT if Light is hurt).
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>