Welcome to PatsFans.com

Question about Redskins signing Haynesworth and tampering

Discussion in 'NFL Football Forum' started by stevedogc, Feb 25, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. stevedogc

    stevedogc Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    With Free agency not starting til Friday, it was my assumption that team were not allowed to talk to free agents until the start of free agency. However, we have heard from several reports that the Redskins are going to sign Haynesworth for a contract over $100 million. If this is true, it seems pretty cut and dry that the redskins have already been in contact with Haynesworth's agent. How is this not tampering? And I wonder what type of actions Goodell will take against the Redskins. It will be interesting to see if he takes a harsher stance on the Redskins since it seems the weak penalties he gave to the 49ers for tampering last season did not seem to deter the Redskins.

    If it is tampering, my guess he does nothing.
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2009
  2. nashvillepatsfan

    nashvillepatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    3,213
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Right now, everybodies tampering. It happens every year, and unless there's some serious proof, Godell will do nothing. The fact that people say Haynesworth is signing with the Redskins, doesnt mean he is. We'll have to wait, and see. All i've heard down here, is that the Titans have told Albert to look around, get a price, and they'll match it. I tend to not believe anybody at this point.


    Also, would you mind providing a link to what you're talking about
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2009
  3. borg

    borg Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,948
    Likes Received:
    76
    Ratings:
    +177 / 11 / -13

    Filming on the sidelines costs a 1st rounder, but negotiating with other teams' players is a rule that is ignored. Selective inforcement....and since Washington is involved...why would the rules get in the way in that city. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that hidden away in the govt stimulus plan is a $100 million "Defensive" appropriation for DC.
  4. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,711
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +22 / 2 / -0

    Of course, the Redskins are tampering. What do you think Snyder

    and Haynesworth's agent are talking about when they are having

    supper together. I doubt they are discussing contract bridge strategy.
  5. xmarkd400x

    xmarkd400x Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,746
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    OR

    The Redskins could have "leaked" it to the press. That wouldn't be tampering. There's no guarantee Haynesworth would read that! =P
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>