Welcome to PatsFans.com

Proselytizers: Threat or Menace?

Discussion in 'Religion and Lighthearted Discussion' started by PatsFanInVa, Mar 12, 2007.

  1. PatsFanInVa

    PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    20,185
    Likes Received:
    228
    Ratings:
    +346 / 6 / -8

    In keeping with the Religion forum's commitment to "fair and balanced" discussion, I thought I phrase it as a choice each individual can make :)

    Per NYC's request - here is our proselytizing thread. How do we feel about the practice?

    PFnV
  2. 3 to be 4

    3 to be 4 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0


    my point is made. No answers to the point that were made other than to whine about the discussion being brought up in the first place

    weak. very weak.
  3. PatsFanInVa

    PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    20,185
    Likes Received:
    228
    Ratings:
    +346 / 6 / -8

    Nice of you to stop by, 3. You're unfamiliar with irony, I take it.

    PFnV
  4. NYCPatsFan

    NYCPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    Merci beacoup!

    But only two choices to label them? Persons in that line of business will be furious...:)

    I consider them as a tolerable menace in the developed countries and but a threat in the developing countries.

    3 to 4: since you are obviously involved in it full time, I am curious to hear your thoughts on why you think it is laudable. I know you might have already touched upon it in depth in other threads but I haven't had a chance to read them in full. A new thread might open doors to discuss or present points in a different light. Care to consider?

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>