- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 5,511
- Reaction score
- 2,299
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Miguel said:
Miguel said:
oldrover said:Isn't the maximum RFA tender something like $1.8mil, and a team would have to come up with two draft picks if they signed him?
He's an Unrestricted Free Agent.oldrover said:Isn't the maximum RFA tender something like $1.8mil, and a team would have to come up with two draft picks if they signed him?
oldrover said:Uh... hello?!?!?! I KNOW he's an UFA this year. They said LAST year he got the highest tender at $1.43m, and my understanding was that 1.43mil is NOT the highest tender as an RFA. There's one at 1.8mil that requires 2 #1 picks as comp.
oldrover said:Uh... hello?!?!?! I KNOW he's an UFA this year. They said LAST year he got the highest tender at $1.43m, and my understanding was that 1.43mil is NOT the highest tender as an RFA. There's one at 1.8mil that requires 2 #1 picks as comp.
Whether they were accurate about last year is irrelevant, he's a UFA now and the posts above this accurately describe the options the Patriots have.patchick said:Yes, I believe you're absolutely right. As I recall Givens received the mid-level tender, not the top level -- the article is mistaken. No clue why so many posters misunderstood you.
khayos said:Givens is going to the Redskins I fear... they'll offer him the big money, Patten's already there, and they need a solid #2 receiver to Santana Moss.
oldrover said:Uh... hello?!?!?! I KNOW he's an UFA this year. They said LAST year he got the highest tender at $1.43m, and my understanding was that 1.43mil is NOT the highest tender as an RFA. There's one at 1.8mil that requires 2 #1 picks as comp.
patchick said:Yes, I believe you're absolutely right. .... No clue why so many posters misunderstood you.