FourierSeries
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 6,859
- Reaction score
- 8,386
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm sure revis going to the jets had no bearing on your opinion there.
Because I remember 6 months ago we all were in agreement revis was the best in the land
I wonder where the players would rank Brady now if they did the rankings again, because these were done months ago. It would probably be ugly.
I'd take Peterson over any of them right now.
Based on age you need to.
Sherman was #11 and Revis was #17. Can't argue with that - Sherman was definitely better than Revis last year.
Also, Brady and Gronk are confirmed to be in the top 10 now. Brady will likely be #1, but Gronk deserves to be top 5 too.
I fully understand that Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Given that, Revis deserved a much higher ranking if nothing else but to move and take out (without deep safety help) the opponent's best receiver.Sherman was #11 and Revis was #17. Can't argue with that - Sherman was definitely better than Revis last year.
Also, Brady and Gronk are confirmed to be in the top 10 now. Brady will likely be #1, but Gronk deserves to be top 5 too.
In the KC game?Watched the Revis top 100 video. Damn he was good *in the regular season*
I'd take Peterson over any of them right now.
Revis plays the hardest position in the league and he does it the hardest way. Straight-up man to man against the best receiver with little help. Anyone picking the coddled brat on the Seahawks over Revis is not paying attention.