Welcome to PatsFans.com

PFT: No tampering charges

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by JSn, Oct 15, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JSn

    JSn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,449
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -0

    There's a load off. :rolleyes:

    ProFootballTalk.com - RAIDERS WON’T FILE TAMPERING CHARGES AGAINST PATRIOTS

    Excerpt:
    Of course it will. But turn the tables and it wouldn't.
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2008
  2. Urgent

    Urgent Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,937
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    Re: PFT: No tampering charges.

    If there is no penalty for the Raiders, it would be a major change of character for Goodell.

    He just suspended Pacman Jones indefinitely for tussling with his bodyguard, basically because he said 'no tolerance.'

    If he has behaved this way in the past, and sent a letter to the Raiders stating penalties if the charges were not backed up, he would be very inconsistent if he doesn't follow through on his word.
  3. Sivy

    Sivy Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,060
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: PFT: No tampering charges.

    Didnt they already report this?
  4. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

  5. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Re: PFT: No tampering charges.

    Very true...but of course since it's teh PATRIOT's QB..all is just as it is.. Goodell is a dunce..and the quicker he's toast the better it is for football..
  6. jmt57

    jmt57 Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,085
    Likes Received:
    70
    Ratings:
    +166 / 0 / -0

    Re: PFT: No tampering charges.

    The Raiders couldn't bring tampering charges against the Patriots now even if they wanted to. One of the points in the memo Goodell sent out was that any competitive rules violations must be made in a timely manner; 18 months later is certainly not 'in a timely manner.'

    Besides, the Raiders are already on thin ice for making a false accusation in this matter. To file tampering charges now, it would insure the NFL would turn around and penalize the Raiders.

    This is a real no-news story. PFT is trying to make something out of nothing.
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2008
  7. captadamnj

    captadamnj Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    And that's different from many media outlets how? :D Gotta pull the readers in, anyway they can. News? What is "news" has become whatever topic and headline will grab the most interest, with lesser regard given to validity and relevance.

    Anyway, good news there wasn't tampering, my respect for the Pats organization was hanging in the balance, you know. :rolleyes:
  8. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    26,463
    Likes Received:
    347
    Ratings:
    +877 / 16 / -24

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: PFT: No tampering charges.

    Once he is toast, we should all elect me as the next commissioner.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>