- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,091
- Reaction score
- 22,701
Oh no, we can't trade our 7th!!! (just kidding).
Brings back fond memories of BB throwing in a 7th for Welker and the serious butthurt on this board. Good Times!
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Oh no, we can't trade our 7th!!! (just kidding).
No.. They can't both be stashed on the PUP. Neither were on the PUP prior to their acquisition. Once you've practiced, you can't be put on the PUP list.
But they could take him and then put him immediately on IR if they wanted to, right? I mean, maybe this isn't about anything regarding 2014, but maybe BB thought that Worthy has a lot of talent, and having another year to come back from injury, he's worth having in our organization to see what happens in 2015.
My bad, I thought I had read that neither had practiced yet.
My favorite DTs were Jerel Worthy, Kendall Reyes, Brandon Thompson and Devon Still, in that order. I was right about Reyes but I really messed up on the other three ...
My bad, I thought I had read that neither had practiced yet.
Green Bay Packers agree to trade Jerel Worthy to the New England Patriots - espnBostonAll deals have that clause, but it's especially important in this case because Worthy has not practiced so far in training camp due to a lower back injury. He could not pass his physical when camp started and was placed on the non-football injury list.
Jerel Worthy had good workout #'s. If he would have had a great work ethic he was probably capable of an elite combine performance. Better work ethic and he likely jumps over 30 inches,broad jumps well over 9', easily runs a sub 5 second 40 and reps well over 30. A strong Work ethic and his 3 cone could have been rediculous as it wasn't far from some good LBs.
There are a handful of specific teams (Broncos, Indy, Green Bay, Detroit, maybe SD) which will put the Pats in the nickel, but for the most part, they won't be in nickel much if they can't stop the run.I don't think it's a sign of that at all. The Patriots "base" this year will more than likely be irrelevant once again and they'll more than likely spend most of the time in the nickel, as they have the last few years. If I wanted to, I could make the argument that they'll probably be in the nickel more this year considering some of the higher powered offenses they'll be facing in the NFC North and AFC West.
I believe that the pats were in the nickel on more than 50% of the defensive reps last year. I have always considered the nickel back to be a "starter". After all, he usually gets more reps that at least one of the starting defensive linemen, and perhaps more than one of the starting linebackers.There are a handful of specific teams (Broncos, Indy, Green Bay, Detroit, maybe SD) which will put the Pats in the nickel, but for the most part, they won't be in nickel much if they can't stop the run.
I think it is wrong to use that percentage picture of sub Defenses as a true guide.
Jerel Worthy is known as lazy. He isn't bad for a lazy player. He had 3 sacks as a rookie in part time play. He also had an acl injury last yr. So he hasn't been a bust and he did OK for a team that limits rookies snaps with 3 sacks while being lazy/unfocused. Couple that with a patriot work ethic which he will adopt if he wants to collect NFL paychecks and he could be special. Especially if teammates who work even harder than team standards rub off on him. Raw talent to be a standout player is there.
I'm not sure what your opinion is of a "true guide" (obviously it's not written in stone), but if you've noticed, the defensive percentages of subs have pretty much risen almost every year, and continue to do so.
Last year we were in sub packages 2/3 of the time. I wouldn't expect anything less than 60%, that's for sure. Our "base" defense has basically become obsolete, having only been in base 31% of the reps last season.
I'd agree with the League average or some discount, say 60% overall, over the anomalous percentage from last year. Last year's sub percentage was biased as I explained.