Pats reportedly interested in WR/KR Josh Cribbs

Discussion in ' - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Joey007, Mar 9, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Joey007

    Joey007 In the Starting Line-Up

    #91 Jersey

  2. BradyBranch39

    BradyBranch39 In the Starting Line-Up

  3. Sciz

    Sciz Supporter Supporter

    Bedard brought him up a while ago as a possible offensive contributor. He's got the skillset (not big or fast, but YAC ability) that the Pats tend to maximize. Also, I think it's worth pointing out that the Browns purposely limited him on offense because they had him doing everything on STs, both returning and covering.
  4. supafly

    supafly Supporter Supporter

    #32 Jersey

    I would see a potential improvement to the ST and even as a replacement to Edelman, if it comes down to him leaving.

    I'm glad that Belichick is viewing all options and possibilities.
  5. yopats

    yopats Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Re: Re: Josh Cribbs

    Could he replace Matthew Slater in that role?
  6. Sciz

    Sciz Supporter Supporter

    One does not simply replace the best punt gunner in the NFL.
  7. Joey007

    Joey007 In the Starting Line-Up

    #91 Jersey

    Yep. Basically its our obligation to keep him. :rolleyes:
  8. Brady6

    Brady6 Pro Bowl Player

    #12 Jersey


    SONS_OF_BELICHICK Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    #93 Jersey

    Not interested.....
  10. patsfan-1982

    patsfan-1982 In the Starting Line-Up

    he would give the pats the KR they need and the deep threat this bord wants, but i think some crazy team will over pay for him
  11. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    I like Cribbs a lot, only marginally as a WR but he's one of the better dual threat KR/PR out there. He would give us one of the more solid returners and keep guys like McCourty from risking injury. Cribbs would be part of the solution at both KR and PR.
  12. mgteich

    mgteich Veteran Supporter

    i have no problem with Cribbs as our kick returner (and likely punt returner). This most likely would be instead of Edelman, but that doesn't need to be so.
  13. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    #22 Jersey

    Nope, its not an obligation but a its a good idea to have pro bowl special framers. :rolleyes:

    You act like BB has no clue what he is doing by taking a roster spot up for Slater.
  14. Joey007

    Joey007 In the Starting Line-Up

    #91 Jersey

    When did I say that?? I was just using sarcasm against guys who say that, "oh, we are wasting space with keeping Slater." Maybe I should've made myself clearer.
  15. signbabybrady

    signbabybrady Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    #22 Jersey

    I guess I shouldn't post in the middle of the night. I thought your sarcastic comment was the exact opposite of what you meant.
  16. The_Riddler

    The_Riddler 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Could be a solid, cost-effective move to really bolster a major KR/PR need and to add some YAC to this WR group. I would have no issues bringing him in here. This guy has never had a QB and no question TB would get him the ball in space to allow him to make plays.
  17. patsinthesnow

    patsinthesnow Supporter Supporter

    #87 Jersey

    Josh Cribbs: 43 returns 1,178 yards 27.4 avg 0 TDs
    Devin McCourty: 27 returns 654 yards 24.2 avg 1 TD

    4th highest KR average in the league with no TD returns, he'd be a great upgrade over McCourty in that area and would get McCourty out of harms way on KRs.

    Josh Cribbs: 38 returns 457 yards 12 avg 0 TDs
    Julian Edelman: 17 returns 263 yards 15.5 avg 1 TD

    Edelman is a better returner, but Cribbs has way more experience in this area. 12 avg still puts him at 6th in the league, Edelman didn't qualify without enough returns.

    If he comes as the same price as Edelman, I say sign Cribbs. He's way more durable and improves our KR game. Cribbs has also done more as a WR than Edelman over the last four years.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page