SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Can you stop with the "PATs" thing. They are not an extra point. It's either PATS or pats
did you miss the part of this offseason where the dolphins lost their #1 CB, #1 RB and their defensive leader?
So now Amendola is gonna cost the Pats a loss or two?
And the same problem won't happen to Tannehill and Wallace, Keller, and Gibson?Do you think he will be as effective as Wes was starting with PATS first game? Do you know you know Brady's game is anticipation not reaction?
Do you know it tales time to develop that aspect of a passing game? It
take seeing and reacting to a variety of defensive configurations before
things begin to hum.
All I'm saying here is, if PATs have some stiff competition in the early part
of the season and all offensive pieces are not at the top of their game it
could cost them.
If you all been keeping tabs on the Fins you must have noticed
all the new peices added to bolster their pass attack.
Mike Wallace , Brandon Gibson, Dustin Keller
That is significant improvement. No wonder Ryan Tannehill maybe the
biggest breakout player in the AFC East
AFC East 2013 breakout players - AFC East Blog - ESPN
The Patriots biggest Defensive weakness last year was their Pass D.
Is is coincidental that the Fins are trying to make a significant improvement
to their passing attack? Have the Fins decided that this is
the way to get to the PATS and possibly take over the division.
Question have the PATS really done anything significant to insure a much
better Pass D or are they still trying to get buy on the cheap? Is Re-signing Arrington
and signing A.Wilson enough for a woeful secondary? We need pass rush you say.
OK where is the proven pass rusher they added?
I am going to be disappointed if PATS pass D ends up in the lower 50 percentile.
Prediction: if PATS pass D is not significantly improved they
will not win the division and they may not even make the playoffs.
And the same problem won't happen to Tannehill and Wallace, Keller, and Gibson?
I don't think it's about discounting other teams. To say the Patriots are going to miss the playoffs if their pass D doesn't finish in the top 16 is overboard since they've won 25 regular season games with a crappy pass D the last two years. Then to try and justify it because there are new players on the Patriots that won't have chemistry with Brady while ignoring that MIA will have to do it with even more personnel.I think it is silly to discount the Dolphins or any team in the AFC East. The Phins have done a lot to improve their offense, and the QB is heading into his second year.
They could give the Patriots real problems.
Maybe a few seasons ago, but not lately. He was the fourth best offensive tackle in the AFC East alone last season.maybe the best LT in the NFL
I think it is silly to discount the Dolphins or any team in the AFC East. The Phins have done a lot to improve their offense, and the QB is heading into his second year.
They could give the Patriots real problems.
As of right now, Bills and Jets are already eliminated from 2013 postseason play.
You probably thought there was no way the Patriots would lose to the Bills in 2011.
This is the NFL, any team on any day.
I do not take any team for granted nor do I expect that specific teams will not make the playoffs.
But, I've been watching football for a while.
Why not try using my whole quote not just the part you want to use
to present a misleading inference.
text out of context is pretext
From the posts you have made so far this seems to be your modus operandi.