SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Our Defense looked better because that was a simplified offense we were playing. Sorry but that Carolina offense SUCKS. They got 1 WR who they have trouble getting the ball to week in and week out so its easier to scheme against DeAngelo Williams and Stewart.
Count me in for a wait and see approach with this D. I want to see us dominate a good offense.
Our Defense looked better because that was a simplified offense we were playing. Sorry but that Carolina offense SUCKS. They got 1 WR who they have trouble getting the ball to week in and week out so its easier to scheme against DeAngelo Williams and Stewart.
Count me in for a wait and see approach with this D. I want to see us dominate a good offense.
Sure it was more simplified, but IMO players are able to stop thinking and just go full out. That's what I saw yesterday - less thinking and more doing. I've heard a lot of people around here whine about how our defense sits back and reacts to the offense. Well, though it may be simpler, can we at least try letting our D make the opposing offense react? Sure, Carolina isn't nearly the best team we've played, but we can at least say that the defense played very well today regardless.
Our Defense looked better because that was a simplified offense we were playing. Sorry but that Carolina offense SUCKS. They got 1 WR who they have trouble getting the ball to week in and week out so its easier to scheme against DeAngelo Williams and Stewart.
Count me in for a wait and see approach with this D. I want to see us dominate a good offense.
Bingo ! we have a winner ...
Our D was steadily improving and peaked in the Indy game 1st half. after than everything seems to go down the drain. But yesterday was a case of inept offense but still as a morale booster, I will take it.
Two words: Matt Moore. Any questions?Did someone really say that the defensive gameplan made a difference? Did someone say that Springs and Sanders made a difference?
This thinking makes ZERO sense.
You don't "dominate" great offenses. Do you really think some defense is going to dominate NO into scoring 10 points?
The point is to limit great offenses.
Sure it was more simplified, but IMO players are able to stop thinking and just go full out. That's what I saw yesterday - less thinking and more doing. I've heard a lot of people around here whine about how our defense sits back and reacts to the offense. Well, though it may be simpler, can we at least try letting our D make the opposing offense react? Sure, Carolina isn't nearly the best team we've played, but we can at least say that the defense played very well today regardless.
Our Defense looked better because that was a simplified offense we were playing. Sorry but that Carolina offense SUCKS. They got 1 WR who they have trouble getting the ball to week in and week out so its easier to scheme against DeAngelo Williams and Stewart.
Count me in for a wait and see approach with this D. I want to see us dominate a good offense.
I thought the same thing, this is a little concerning for when we play dominant offenses like Chargers, Colts, Bengals, all teams we could play in the playoffs. I dont think you can have a simplied game plan against those teams because they are just too powerful and full of weapons.
I will never say it's "concerning" when we give up 10 points and generally play solid D, especially given how often they had to go right back out there when the offense sputtered.
?