Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by QB12, Sep 12, 2006.
Behind Pitt and Indy, respectively.
Sounds like considerably more respect than we've earned.
But, then again, who should be higher? San Diego?
Why not Jacksonville?
Despite it being to Huston, I would have put the Eagles up there.
I'm surprised at how high the Eagles are (5) and how low the Chargers are (15).
This is an outrage. There is no doubt that we should be #1. Fire up the No Respect Bandwagon. Fall in line folks!!! :rocker:
Prisco is a schmoe anyway, I don't care what he says one way or the other.
The Colts D was gashed through like you read about, they're kicking field goals where last year they were scoring TD's and their running game averaged like 2.9 yards a carry and he has them #2.
Right, the Patriots and their 3 yards passing at the half should have been there instead.
Better 3 yards passing at the half than unable to run the ball or stop the run the whole game, I say.
Did they seriously only have 3 yards at halftime?
This has almost nothing to do with the BUF game except that it was a win. The Pats started the season 4th in his rankings, behind PIT, CAR, and IND. Carolina lost, so they dropped, the others won so we effectively stay where we are but have to move up a slot to fill Carolina's vacancy.
Passing, yes. At the half, 3 yards passing, and 112 yards rushing.
Chargers should most certainly be higher, Eagles seem to be in the right spot, I'd drop New England a few based on the massive number of yet-unanswered questions.
Doesn't matter anyway, Power Rankings are a joke, and they're a hysterical joke based on ONE game. Even the moron Prisco said as much (and yes, Ronnie, we all think he's a moron even when he puts the Pats in the number one slot).
Damn... I was at the game so I didn't know the game stats (and apparently haven't read the papers either). I knew the passing game was pretty bad, but I didn't realize it was that bad.
+30 on passes, -27 on sacks.
Separate names with a comma.