- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
- Messages
- 11,954
- Reaction score
- 11,555
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.First sporting event you ever watched, then?
FINALLY SOMEONE UNDERSTANDS WHERE I'M COMING FROM!!!!!!!
The holes we saw today almost always COMEBACK WHEN THE PATRIOTS CAN'S AFFORD THEM TO!!
This was was good, but it can also be seen as a warning sign/blueprint to defeat.
Sure they will, and I agree it shouldn't have been close. But they aren't all going to be high scoring affairs. Winning a trap game on the road against a good defense when you're a bit off isn't bad. Plenty of humble pie for BB to serve up before Houston comes to town.
No. In 2003, they won by having their defense grind the hell out of opponents. It wasn't about being a little better than the other team. It was about shutting down the opponent. They went 14-2 despite hitting 30 points only 5 times in that season, and they won 5 games while scoring under 20 points.
No. In 2003, they won by having their defense grind the hell out of opponents. It wasn't about being a little better than the other team. It was about shutting down the opponent. They went 14-2 despite hitting 30 points only 5 times in that season, and they won 5 games while scoring under 20 points.
Listen, the offense can be more efficient if they got more production from the outside.Mainly LLoyd who to me has been a dissapointment.
can someone explain to me what brady saw on that interception..............................................................................................
Cmon don't get pissy, just explain more. You're saying the Pats aren't that good despite the win because the phins rookie QB sucks, I get that. The win against Manning mean anything? He is up for MVP and Broncos are on fire. Pats still not that good?
Still and all, I'm not surprised with how this game went. Despite the various records, every game in the AFCE is usually a dog fight. I mean, each team sees each other twice a year. there just aren't that many things you can keep a secret from them, you know?
Each team knows the other very well, and sooner or later they'll figure it out. Usually, like today, it comes down to which team executes their plays the best, which defense reads the fastest and reacts properly. And yeah, which team has the calls go their way.
But I'm happy with the win, and looking forward to next Sunday.
The question about the Patriots is not whether they can beat playoff teams when they put 40 points on the board. The question is not whether they can beat crap teams in the regular season when they don't put up 40 points on the board.
The question about the Patriots is whether or not they can beat playoff teams when the offense gets held in check. Today offered nothing to tell us that they can. They struggled to beat the Dolphins and Ryan freakin' Tannehill.
They won in Miami in December. That's great. If Tannehill didn't suck, things could have been different. If you can't see why that's an issue, you haven't watched this team in recent years.
Be more pessimistic pleeez. Do you expect the Patriots to be the greatest team ever that has no chance of losing to even the best opponents? Plus you're falling for the same double standard that everyone else does... If the Patriots score 17 points it was a terrible day for the offense, but because the opponent managed to score 21 the Patriots' defense is the worst defense ever. Do you think that the Patriots have the only offense in the NFL that should ever be capable of scoring? Guess what, if the offense plays like crap, and the opponents offense doesn't, yeah no kidding they'll lose games! Why do you want to see a game so badly where both offenses play terrible?
Oh and by the way, if you want to see a close game against a playoff team that the Patriots won despite their offense struggling, how about, oh I don't know, the AFC Championship game last year? And don't tell me that they only won because of a fluke play from Sterling Moore... Then you'd be asking the Patriots to win a game against an elite team where the offense struggles and the defense doesn't make any plays? Also, I know "it's a completely different team from last year", but give me a break, it's a marginally different team at most. They are clearly capable of beating elite teams, and they are capable of winning close games, and they are capable of doing both at the same time.
Now enjoy the 10th Division Championship under Brady like everyone else is!
See, that's not what I'm saying. However, go find the team's record, post 2008, when they put less than 20 on the board. It's something like 1-9.
Not putting up elite fantasy WR numbers =/= "lost" in the offense. He knows what to do, he's just not getting a ton of separation.Hey Marqui,have u been watching LLoyd this season?Seriously.He is on pace to do what Branch did last year and Branch is no longer on this team.I expected more consistency
The question about the Patriots is not whether they can beat playoff teams when they put 40 points on the board. The question is not whether they can beat crap teams in the regular season when they don't put up 40 points on the board.
The question about the Patriots is whether or not they can beat playoff teams when the offense gets held in check. Today offered nothing to tell us that they can. They struggled to beat the Dolphins and Ryan freakin' Tannehill.
They won in Miami in December. That's great. If Tannehill didn't suck, things could have been different. If you can't see why that's an issue, you haven't watched this team in recent years.