SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I would disagree. It is a low risk move with a huge amount of upside.
Who knows whether we'll see Galloway reach that upside at 37 and coming off injuries, but the upside would be last year was just an off year due to injuries and he's the 1,000+ yard, elite deep threat receiver he's been the last 3 years prior to this season.
One interesting little side note - Pat's WR depth, even before the draft:
Randy Moss
Wes Welker
Joey Galloway
Greg Lewis
Sam Aiken
Matt Slater
Pats typically keep five receivers, possibly six.
There's a decent chance the Pats end up with a receiver in the draft, what with eleven picks or so.
Matt Slater? Nice knowing ya.
Well, I'll agree that Slater played other positions.
Not ready to consent to actual utility at other positions.
He drops pass attempts.
He drops kick-offs.
He drops interception attempts.
So I guess the same utility at other positions.
I would think it would be disrespect to Troy Brown to say that Troy would not be in as good a shape similar to Galloway today - So if there was a choice and Troy wanted to play again (which is not going to happen he is done),I would take Troy over Galloway - I think Joey will give us about the same what Troy gave us in 2006 - nothing great but will catch some clutch catches on 3rd down.
You can tell Belichick wants Revenge. he wants MORE then the Superbowl. He wants 19-0.
Troy Brown was slow as molasses at the end of his career, while Galloway has always been a burner. If he doesn't have his speed, he's not worth much anymore, but if he does he'll be a better player than 2006 Troy Brown.
New England has clearly established itself as the place to go for players who aren't getting what they want on the free agent market.
Play with the best for a year. Maybe win a ring. Then earn major bucks in free agency.