Because they outcoached the Pats.I look forward to these games.
The Giants lost half their LBs and a starting CB and still won the SB.
SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Because they outcoached the Pats.I look forward to these games.
The Giants lost half their LBs and a starting CB and still won the SB.
Bein that JE is ruled out this week Vs Bills I was trying to see if that is a good thing-bad thing, has a positive or negative effect on Pat's Offense mainly having to do with Welker goin back into his full time slot receiving role.
With all these posts of JE starting over Welker limiting his play etc, now Welker has his slot back full time VS Bills would Pat's offense run take a hit or run more smoothly for Brady?
Thoughts?
So if Gronk can't go we're looking at a TE lineup of Fells and Hoohoo?
Yeah but the "summer of Gronk" was a ton of fun.
Line up Branch and Lloyd on the outside, Woodhead and Welker in the slots, Ridley in the backfield.
The fact that you're using that as an example why Gronk is questionable is rather sad. Grasping at straws it seems.
I hope Brady isn't teed off tomorrow.
Thomas-Wendell-Connolly
Why on earth would they use Woodhead in the slot? He's not a good receiver. His route running and awareness is mediocre-to-poor and his hands aren't particularly good.
They'd be better off splitting Fells or Hoomanawanui off the line than putting Woodhead in the slot.
Might be Wendell-New guy-Connolly.
Comments are performance based:
2011 : 1327 Yards
2012 : 832 Yards projected
That was awesome how he partied all night after the Superbowl, and his self named "Summer of Gronk" sure was a boon for the Enquirer and People Magazine, and that huge new contract was a lot of fun too !
The 1 -2 start to the season.........not so much.
OK . . . please explain to me how the "Summer of GRONK" is responsible for this. . . .